A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility

被引:133
作者
Cook, W. D. [2 ]
Liang, L. [3 ]
Zha, Y. [3 ]
Zhu, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Management, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[2] York Univ, Toronto, ON M3J 2R7, Canada
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China, He Fei, An Hui Province, Peoples R China
关键词
data envelopment analysis (DEA); infeasibility; super-efficiency; data extremities; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; UNITS;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602544
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The super-efficiency data envelopment analysis (DEA) model is obtained when a decision making unit (DMU) under evaluation is excluded from the reference set. This model provides for a measure of stability of the "efficient" status for frontier DMUs. Under the assumption of variable returns to scale (VRS), the super efficiency model can be infeasible for some efficient DMUs, specifically those at the extremities of the frontier. The current study develops an approach to overcome infeasibility issues. It is shown that when the model is feasible, our approach yields super-efficiency scores that are equivalent to those arising from the original model. For efficient DMUs that are infeasible under the super-efficiency model, our approach yields optimal solutions and scores that characterize the extent of super-efficiency in both inputs and outputs. The newly developed approach is illustrated with two real world data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 281
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   A PROCEDURE FOR RANKING EFFICIENT UNITS IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
ANDERSEN, P ;
PETERSEN, NC .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (10) :1261-1265
[2]  
[Anonymous], RES GOV NONPROFIT AC
[3]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[4]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[5]   Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility [J].
Chen, Y .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2005, 161 (02) :545-551
[6]   Ranking efficient units in DEA [J].
Chen, Y .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2004, 32 (03) :213-219
[7]   Models for performance benchmarking: measuring the effect of e-business activities on banking performance [J].
Cook, WD ;
Seiford, LA ;
Zhu, J .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2004, 32 (04) :313-322
[8]  
Dula JH, 1997, J OPER RES SOC, V48, P1001, DOI 10.1038/sj.jors.2600434
[9]   MALMQUIST PRODUCTIVITY INDEXES AND FISHER IDEAL INDEXES [J].
FARE, R ;
GROSSKOPF, S .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1992, 102 (410) :158-160
[10]   Equivalent standard DEA models to provide superefficiency scores [J].
Lovell, CAK ;
Rouse, APB .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2003, 54 (01) :101-108