Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE):: a randomised trial against atenolol

被引:1083
作者
Lindholm, LH [1 ]
Ibsen, H
Dahlöf, B
Devereux, RB
Beevers, G
de Faire, U
Fyhrquist, F
Julius, S
Kjeldsen, SE
Kristiansson, K
Lederballe-Pedersen, O
Nieminen, MS
Omvik, P
Oparil, S
Wedel, H
Aurup, P
Edelman, J
Snapinn, S
机构
[1] Univ Umea Hosp, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, SE-90185 Umea, Sweden
[2] Glostrup Univ Hosp, Glostrup, Denmark
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Cornell Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[5] City Hosp, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[6] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[8] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[9] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Oslo, Norway
[10] Merck Res Labs Scandinavia, Stockholm, Sweden
[11] Viborg Hosp, Viborg, Denmark
[12] Haukeland Hosp, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
[13] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[14] Nord Sch Publ Hlth, Gothenburg, Sweden
[15] Merck Res Labs, West Point, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08090-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The most suitable anti hypertensive drug to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with hypertension and diabetes is unclear. In prespecified analyses, we compared the effects of losartan and atenolol on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients. Interpretation Losartan was more effective than atenolol in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as well as mortality from all causes in patients with hypertension, diabetes, and LVH. Losartan seems to have benefits beyond blood pressure reduction. Methods As part of the LIFE study, in a double-masked, randomised, parallel-group trial, we assigned a group of 1195 patients with diabetes, hypertension, and signs of left-ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on electrocardiograms losartan-based or atenolol-based treatment. Mean age of patients was 67 years (SD 7) and mean blood pressure 177/96 mm Hg (14/10) after placebo run-in. We followed up patients for at least 4 years (mean 4.7 years [1.1]). We used Cox regression analysis with baseline Framingham risk score and electrocardiogram-LVH as covariates to compare the effects of the drugs on the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction). Findings Mean blood pressure fell to 146/79 mm Hg (17/11) in losartan patients and 148/79 mm Hg (19/11) in atenolol patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 103 patients assigned losartan (n = 586) and 139 assigned atenolol (n = 609); relative risk 0.76 (95% CI 0.58-0.98), p = 0.031. 38 and 61 patients in the losartan and atenolol groups, respectively, died from cardiovascular disease; 0.63 (0.42-0.95), p = 0.028. Mortality from all causes was 63 and 104 in losartan and atenolol groups, respectively; 0.61 (0.45-0.84), p = 0.002. Interpretation Losartan was more effective than atenolol in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as well as mortality from all causes in patients with hypertension, diabetes, and LVH. Losartan seems to have benefits beyond blood pressure reduction.
引用
收藏
页码:1004 / 1010
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] AN UPDATED CORONARY RISK PROFILE - A STATEMENT FOR HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS
    ANDERSON, KM
    WILSON, PWF
    ODELL, PM
    KANNEL, WB
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1991, 83 (01) : 356 - 362
  • [2] [Anonymous], DIABETES CARE, DOI DOI 10.2337/DIACARE.25.2007.S85
  • [3] Separate and joint effects of systemic hypertension and diabetes mellitus on left ventricular structure and function in American Indians - (The strong heart study)
    Bella, JN
    Devereux, RB
    Roman, MJ
    Palmieri, V
    Liu, JE
    Paranicas, M
    Welty, TK
    Lee, ET
    Fabsitz, RR
    Howard, BV
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 87 (11) : 1260 - 1265
  • [4] Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy
    Brenner, BM
    Cooper, ME
    de Zeeuw, D
    Keane, WF
    Mitch, WE
    Parving, HH
    Remuzzi, G
    Snapinn, SM
    Zhang, ZX
    Shahinfar, S
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (12) : 861 - 869
  • [5] Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT)
    Brown, MJ
    Palmer, CR
    Castaigne, A
    de Leeuw, PW
    Mancia, G
    Rosenthal, T
    Ruilope, LM
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9227) : 366 - 372
  • [6] Chalmers J, 1999, J HYPERTENS, V17, P151
  • [7] Effect of diuretic-based antihypertensive treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in older diabetic patients with isolated systolic hypertension
    Curb, JD
    Pressel, SL
    Cutler, JA
    Savage, PJ
    Applegate, WB
    Black, H
    Camel, G
    Davis, BR
    Frost, PH
    Gonzalez, N
    Guthrie, G
    Oberman, A
    Rutan, GH
    Stamler, J
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (23): : 1886 - 1892
  • [8] Dahlof B, 1997, AM J HYPERTENS, V10, P705
  • [9] Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE):: a randomised trial against atenolol
    Dahlöf, B
    Devereux, RB
    Kjeldsen, SE
    Julius, S
    Beevers, G
    de Faire, U
    Fyhrquist, F
    Ibsen, H
    Kristiansson, K
    Lederballe-Pedersen, O
    Lindholm, LH
    Nieminen, MS
    Omvik, P
    Oparil, S
    Wedel, H
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9311) : 995 - 1003
  • [10] Characteristics of 9194 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy -: The LIFE study
    Dahlöf, B
    Devereux, RB
    Julius, S
    Kjeldsen, SE
    Beevers, G
    de Faire, U
    Fyhrquist, F
    Hedner, T
    Ibsen, H
    Kristianson, K
    Lederballe-Pedersen, O
    Lindholm, LH
    Nieminen, MS
    Omvik, P
    Oparil, S
    Wedel, H
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 1998, 32 (06) : 989 - 997