Diagnosing a firm's internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship

被引:182
作者
Kuratko, Donald F. [1 ]
Hornsby, Jeffrey S. [2 ]
Covin, Jeffrey G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Bloch Sch Management, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
关键词
Corporate entrepreneurship; Measurement; Internal environment; Corporate Entrepreneurship Assessment Instrument; Diagnostic tools; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bushor.2013.08.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Apple, 3M, Procter Et Gamble, and Google know the importance of an internal environment supportive of innovative activity. But how is that environment identified or measured? As research on corporate entrepreneurial activity has evolved, numerous researchers have acknowledged the importance of internal organizational dimensions to promoting and supporting an environment for innovation. This research has identified five specific dimensions that are important determinants of an environment conducive to entrepreneurial behavior: (1) top management support, (2) work discretion/autonomy, (3) rewards/reinforcement, (4) time availability, and (5) organizational boundaries. If an organization is serious about developing an internal environment conducive to entrepreneurial activity, then it must seek to measure the specific dimensions associated with an innovative environment. In this article we introduce an instrument, the Corporate Entrepreneurship Assessment Instrument (CEAI), as a diagnostic tool used for assessing managers' perceptions of the five major dimensions critical to creating an entrepreneurial/innovative environment. This instrument provides an indication of a firm's likelihood of being able to successfully implement an innovative strategy, and highlights areas of the internal work environment that should be the focus of ongoing development efforts. (C) 2013 Kelley School of Business, Indiana University. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 47
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Bedigian L., 2011, FORBES
[2]   THE NEW COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE [J].
BETTIS, RA ;
HITT, MA .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1995, 16 :7-19
[3]   RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, AND SURVIVAL: ASYMMETRIC PATHS OF YOUNG INDEPENDENT AND SUBSIDIARY ORGANIZATIONS [J].
Bradley, Steven W. ;
Aldrich, Howard ;
Shepherd, Dean A. ;
Wiklund, Johan .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (05) :486-509
[4]  
Brown B, 2011, HARVARD BUS REV, V89, P64
[5]   Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities [J].
Chattopadhyay, P ;
Glick, WH ;
Huber, GP .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 44 (05) :937-955
[6]   Corporate Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Silicon Valley: The Case of Google, Inc. [J].
Finkle, Todd A. .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 36 (04) :863-887
[7]   Operations management and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating effect of operations control on the antecedents of corporate entrepreneurial activity in relation to innovation performance [J].
Goodale, John C. ;
Kuratko, Donald F. ;
Hornsby, Jeffrey S. ;
Covin, Jeffrey G. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (1-2) :116-127
[8]  
Govindarajan V, 2005, HARVARD BUS REV, V83, P58
[9]  
Gunther M., 2010, CNN MONEY
[10]  
Hornsby J.S., 1999, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V24, P9, DOI DOI 10.1177/104225879902400202