Predictive power of increased heart rate versus depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and heart rate variability for risk stratification after myocardial infarction - Results of a two-year follow-up study

被引:183
作者
Copie, X [1 ]
Hnatkova, K [1 ]
Staunton, A [1 ]
Fei, L [1 ]
Camm, AJ [1 ]
Malik, M [1 ]
机构
[1] ST GEORGE HOSP,SCH MED,DEPT CARDIOL SCI,LONDON SW17 0RE,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0735-1097(95)00454-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. The aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of mean RR interval assessed from predischarge Holter recordings with that of heart rate variability and left ventricular ejection fraction for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Background. Heart rate variability is a powerful tool for risk stratification after myocardial infarction, Although heart rate variability is related to heart rate, little is known of the prognostic value of 24-h mean heart rate. Methods, A total of 579 patients surviving the acute phase of myocardial infarction were followed up for at least 2 years, Pre discharge heart rate variability, 24 h mean RR interval and left ventricular ejection fraction were analyzed. Results, During the first 2 gears of follow-up, there were 54 deaths, 42 of which were cardiac (26 sudden), Shorter mean RR interval was a better predictor of all-cause mortality as well as cardiac and sudden death than depressed left ventricular ejection fraction, Depressed heart rate variability predicted the risk of death better than mean RR interval for sensitivities < 40%. For sensitivities greater than or equal to 40%, mean RR interval was as powerful as heart rate variability, All three variables performed equally well in predicting nonsudden cardiac death, For cardiac death prediction, a left ventricular ejection fraction <35% had a 40% sensitivity, 78% specificity and 14% positive predictive accuracy; a mean RR interval <700 ms had a 45% sensitivity, 85% specificity and 20% positive predictive accuracy; and a heart rate variability <17 U had a 40% sensitivity, 86% specificity and 20% positive predictive accuracy. Conclusions. Predischarge 24-h mean heart rate is a strong predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction that can compete with left ventricular ejection fraction and heart rate variability.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 276
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY FROM 24-HOUR ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY AND THE 2-YEAR RISK FOR SUDDEN-DEATH [J].
ALGRA, A ;
TIJSSEN, JGP ;
ROELANDT, JRTC ;
POOL, J ;
LUBSEN, J .
CIRCULATION, 1993, 88 (01) :180-185
[2]  
BEERE PA, 1984, SCIENCE, V27, P180
[3]   HEART-RATE AND HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY AS INDEXES OF SYMPATHOVAGAL BALANCE [J].
BOOTSMA, M ;
SWENNE, CA ;
VANBOLHUIS, HH ;
CHANG, PC ;
CATS, VM ;
BRUSCHKE, AVG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 266 (04) :H1565-H1571
[4]   HEART-RATE AND HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY IN NORMAL YOUNG-ADULTS [J].
COUMEL, P ;
MAISONBLANCHE, P ;
CATULI, D .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 5 (11) :899-911
[5]  
CRIPPS TR, 1991, BRIT HEART J, V65, P14
[6]  
DYER AR, 1980, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V112, P736, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113046
[7]  
FARELL TG, 1991, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V18, P687
[8]   THE CORRELATION BETWEEN HEART PERIOD VARIABILITY AND MEAN PERIOD LENGTH [J].
FLEISS, JL ;
BIGGER, JT ;
ROLNITZKY, LM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (01) :125-129
[9]   CLASSIFICATION OF DEATHS AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION AS ARRHYTHMIC OR NONARRHYTHMIC (THE CARDIAC-ARRHYTHMIA PILOT-STUDY) [J].
GREENE, HL ;
RICHARDSON, DW ;
BARKER, AH ;
RODEN, DM ;
CAPONE, RJ ;
ECHT, DS ;
FRIEDMAN, LM ;
GILLESPIE, MJ ;
HALLSTROM, AP ;
VERTER, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 63 (01) :1-6
[10]   OPEN INFARCT ARTERY, LATE POTENTIALS, AND OTHER PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION IN THE THROMBOLYTIC ERA - A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL [J].
HOHNLOSER, SH ;
FRANCK, P ;
KLINGENHEBEN, T ;
ZABEL, M ;
JUST, H .
CIRCULATION, 1994, 90 (04) :1747-1756