Analysis of remobilization success in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplants who fail an initial mobilization: risk factors, cytokine use and cost

被引:54
作者
Boeve, S
Strupeck, J
Creech, S
Stiff, PJ
机构
[1] Loyola Univ, Med Ctr, BMT Program, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Med Ctr, Inst Oncol, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
关键词
remobilization; autologous stem cell transplants; hard to mobilize patients;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bmt.1704486
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Inadequate stem cell mobilization is seen in approximately 25% of patients undergoing autotransplantation for hematologic malignancies. Remobilization strategies include chemotherapy/cytokine combinations or high-dose cytokines alone or in combination. From 1/1997 to 7/2002, we remobilized 86 patients who failed an initial mobilization (median total CD34 = 0.72 x 10(6)/kg) in sequential cohorts using high-dose G-CSF (32 mug/kg/day) or G-CSF (10 mug/kg/day) + GM-CSF (5 mug/kg/day). No difference in CD34/kg yields were seen (G-CSF alone: 2.2 x 10(6) and G-CSF + GM-CSF 1.6 x 10(6)) in the median 3 aphereses performed (P = 0.333). Of the 86, 23 (27%) failed the second mobilization; 14 were remobilized again (yield = 1.5 x 10(6) CD34/kg; three aphereses). Of the 86, 93% went to transplant: three progressed, and three had inadequate stem cells. Significant risk factors for a failed remobilization were: number of stem-cell-damaging regimens (P = 0.015), time between last chemotherapy and first mobilization (P = 0.028), and higher WBC at initiation of first mobilization (P = 0.04). High-dose G-CSF (32 mug/kg/day) was more costly @ $9,016, vs $5,907 for the G-CSF + GM-CSF combination (P < 0.001). Most patients failing an initial mobilization benefit from a cytokine only remobilization. Lower cost G-CSF + GM-CSF is as effective as high-dose G-CSF.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1003
页数:7
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
ANDREWS RG, 1994, BLOOD, V84, P800
[2]  
Bashey A, 1999, BLOOD, V94, p327A
[3]   FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE COLLECTION AND ENGRAFTMENT OF AUTOLOGOUS PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELLS [J].
BENSINGER, W ;
APPELBAUM, F ;
ROWLEY, S ;
STORB, R ;
SANDERS, J ;
LILLEBY, K ;
GOOLEY, T ;
DEMIRER, T ;
SCHIFFMAN, K ;
WEAVER, C ;
CLIFT, R ;
CHAUNCEY, T ;
KLARNET, J ;
MONTGOMERY, P ;
PETERSDORF, S ;
WEIDEN, P ;
WITHERSPOON, R ;
BUCKNER, CD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (10) :2547-2555
[4]   PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELLS (PBSCS) COLLECTED AFTER RECOMBINANT GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR (RHG-CSF) - AN ANALYSIS OF FACTORS CORRELATING WITH THE TEMPO OF ENGRAFTMENT AFTER TRANSPLANTATION [J].
BENSINGER, WI ;
LONGIN, K ;
APPELBAUM, F ;
ROWLEY, S ;
WEAVER, C ;
LILLEBY, K ;
GOOLEY, T ;
LYNCH, M ;
HIGANO, T ;
KLARNET, J ;
CHAUNCEY, T ;
STORB, R ;
BUCKNER, CD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1994, 87 (04) :825-831
[5]  
CANALES MA, 2000, J HEMATOTH STEM CELL, P9103
[6]  
Chao NJ, 1999, BLOOD, V94, p666A
[7]   AUTOLOGOUS PROGENITOR-CELL TRANSPLANTATION - PRIOR EXPOSURE TO STEM CELL-TOXIC DRUGS DETERMINES YIELD AND ENGRAFTMENT OF PERIPHERAL-BLOOD PROGENITOR-CELL BUT NOT OF BONE-MARROW GRAFTS [J].
DREGER, P ;
KLOSS, M ;
PETERSEN, B ;
HAFERLACH, T ;
LOFFLER, H ;
LOEFFLER, M ;
SCHMITZ, N .
BLOOD, 1995, 86 (10) :3970-3978
[8]   G-CSF-MOBILIZED PERIPHERAL-BLOOD PROGENITOR CELLS FOR ALLOGENEIC TRANSPLANTATION - SAFETY, KINETICS OF MOBILIZATION, AND COMPOSITION OF THE GRAFT [J].
DREGER, P ;
HAFERLACH, T ;
ECKSTEIN, V ;
JACOBS, S ;
SUTTORP, M ;
LOFFLER, H ;
MULLERRUCHHOLTZ, W ;
SCHMITZ, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1994, 87 (03) :609-613
[9]   High- versus standard-dose filgrastim (rhG-CSF) for mobilization of peripheral-blood progenitor cells from allogeneic donors and CD34+ immunoselection [J].
Engelhardt, M ;
Bertz, H ;
Afting, M ;
Waller, CF ;
Finke, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (07) :2160-2172
[10]   Successful PBSC mobilization with high-dose G-CSF for patients failing a first round of mobilization [J].
Gazitt, Y ;
Freytes, CO ;
Callander, N ;
Tsai, TW ;
Alsina, M ;
Anderson, J ;
Holle, L ;
Cruz, J ;
Devoer, P ;
McGrath, M ;
West, G ;
Alvarez, R ;
Montgomery, W .
JOURNAL OF HEMATOTHERAPY, 1999, 8 (02) :173-183