Neural specializations for tonal processing

被引:139
作者
Zatorre, RJ [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal Neurol Inst, Montreal, PQ H3A 2B4, Canada
来源
BIOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF MUSIC | 2001年 / 930卷
关键词
hemispheric functional specialization; pitch processing; pitch patterns;
D O I
10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05734.x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The processing of pitch, a central aspect of music perception, is neurally dissociable from other perceptual functions. Studies using behavioral-lesion techniques as well as brain imaging methods demonstrate that tonal processing recruits mechanisms in areas of the right auditory cortex. Specifically, the right primary auditory area appears to be crucial for fine-grained representation of pitch information. Processing of pitch patterns, such as occurs in melodies, requires higher-order cortical areas, and interactions with the frontal cortex. The latter are likely related to tonal working memory functions that are necessary for the on-line maintenance and encoding of tonal patterns. One hypothesis that may explain why right-hemisphere auditory cortices seem to be so important to tonal processing is that left auditory regions are better suited for rapidly changing broad-band stimuli, such as speech, whereas the right auditory cortex may be specialized for slower narrow-band stimuli, such as tonal patterns. Evidence favoring this hypothesis was obtained in a functional imaging study in which spectral and temporal parameters were varied independently. The hypothesis also receives support from structural studies of the auditory cortex, which indicate that spectral and temporal processing may depend on interhemispheric differences in grey/white matter distribution and other anatomical features.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 210
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Anderson B, 1999, NEUROPSY NEUROPSY BE, V12, P247
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Brain mapping: The systems, DOI 10.1016/b978-012692545-6/50014-3
[3]   Lateralization of speech and auditory temporal processing [J].
Belin, P ;
Zilbovicius, M ;
Crozier, S ;
Thivard, L ;
Fontaine, A .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 (04) :536-540
[4]   Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Binder, JR ;
Frost, JA ;
Hammeke, TA ;
Cox, RW ;
Rao, SM ;
Prieto, T .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 17 (01) :353-362
[5]   Optimizing sound features for cortical neurons [J].
deCharms, RC ;
Blake, DT ;
Merzenich, MM .
SCIENCE, 1998, 280 (5368) :1439-1443
[6]   THE ANATOMY OF PHONOLOGICAL AND SEMANTIC PROCESSING IN NORMAL SUBJECTS [J].
DEMONET, JF ;
CHOLLET, F ;
RAMSAY, S ;
CARDEBAT, D ;
NESPOULOUS, JL ;
WISE, R ;
RASCOL, A ;
FRACKOWIAK, R .
BRAIN, 1992, 115 :1753-1768
[7]   A PET STUDY OF COGNITIVE STRATEGIES IN NORMAL SUBJECTS DURING LANGUAGE TASKS - INFLUENCE OF PHONETIC AMBIGUITY AND SEQUENCE PROCESSING ON PHONEME MONITORING [J].
DEMONET, JF ;
PRICE, C ;
WISE, R ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ .
BRAIN, 1994, 117 :671-682
[8]   TONES AND NUMBERS - SPECIFICITY OF INTERFERENCE IN IMMEDIATE MEMORY [J].
DEUTSCH, D .
SCIENCE, 1970, 168 (3939) :1604-&
[9]   NONLINGUISTIC AUDITORY CAPABILITIES IN APHASIA [J].
DIVENYI, PL ;
ROBINSON, AJ .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1989, 37 (02) :290-326
[10]   Representation of spectral and temporal sound features in three cortical fields of the cat. Similarities outweigh differences [J].
Eggermont, JJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 80 (05) :2743-2764