Optimal diversity: Increasing returns versus recombinant innovation

被引:93
作者
van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] ICREA, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Dept Econ & Econ Hist, Bellaterra, Spain
[3] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Inst Environm Sci & Technol, Bellaterra, Spain
[4] Free Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, NL-1007 MC Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Free Univ Amsterdam, Fac Econ & Business Adm, NL-1007 MC Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Balance; Disparity; Distribution; Economies of scale; Efficiency; Evolution; Exploration versus exploitation; Investment theory; Learning; R&D;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2008.09.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Choices regarding diversity play an important role in economics and innovation management, but often remain implicit. Once made explicit, the objectives of efficiency and diversity are usually posed as in conflict, as efficiency relates positively and diversity negatively to various increasing returns to scale in markets. Such a perspective, however, neglects the benefits of diversity in terms of realizing system improvements through recombinant innovation or spillovers. The latter implies a Contribution of diversity to long-term efficiency. Dominant economic approaches that address diversity, such as option value and real options theories, regard benefits of diversity as exogenous. This paper Proposes a simple model of variable, endogenous diversity to analyse the optimal balance between increasing returns to scale and recombinant innovation. It is discussed under Which conditions one of four solutions is optimal: complete specialization regardless of which option, complete specialization in one specific option, symmetric diversity (perfect balance), and asymmetric diversity. The results give rise to a number of policy insights. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 580
页数:16
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
Andersen E. S., 1994, EVOLUTIONARY EC POST
[2]  
[Anonymous], J EVOL EC, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01194367, 10.1007/BF01194367]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, SUSTAINABLE DEV BIOS
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1080/15693430500481295
[5]  
[Anonymous], HDB EC INNOVATION TE
[6]   ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION, UNCERTAINTY, AND IRREVERSIBILITY [J].
ARROW, KJ ;
FISHER, AC .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1974, 88 (02) :312-319
[7]   COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES, INCREASING RETURNS, AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS [J].
ARTHUR, WB .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (394) :116-131
[8]  
ASLAKSEN I, 2004, 390 STAT NORW
[9]  
Baumgartner S, 2004, ECOHEALTH, V1, P101, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10393-004-0003-Z
[10]   CHOOSING HOW TO COMPETE - STRATEGIES AND TACTICS IN STANDARDIZATION [J].
BESEN, SM ;
FARRELL, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 8 (02) :117-131