Behavioral health insurance parity for Federal Employees

被引:142
作者
Goldman, HH
Frank, RG
Burnam, MA
Huskamp, HA
Ridgely, MS
Normand, SLT
Young, AS
Barry, CL
Azzone, V
Busch, AB
Azrin, ST
Moran, G
Lichtenstein, C
Blasinsky, M
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21227 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
[5] Dept Vet Affairs, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[8] McLean Hosp, Belmont, MA 02178 USA
[9] Westat Corp, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[10] Northrop Grumman Informat Technol, Fed Enterprise Solut, Hlth Solut, Rockville, MD USA
[11] CSR, Arlington, VA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMsa053737
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: To improve insurance coverage of mental health and substance-abuse services, the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program offered mental health and substance-abuse benefits on a par with general medical benefits beginning in January 2001. The plans were encouraged to manage care. METHODS: We compared seven FEHB plans from 1999 through 2002 with a matched set of health plans that did not have benefits on a par with mental health and substance-abuse benefits (parity of mental health and substance-abuse benefits). Using a difference-in-differences analysis, we compared the claims patterns of matched pairs of FEHB and control plans by examining the rate of use, total spending, and out-of-pocket spending among users of mental health and substance-abuse services. RESULTS: The difference-in-differences analysis indicated that the observed increase in the rate of use of mental health and substance-abuse services after the implementation of the parity policy was due almost entirely to a general trend in increased use that was observed in comparison health plans as well as FEHB plans. The implementation of parity was associated with a statistically significant increase in use in one plan (+0.78 percent, P<0.05) a significant decrease in use in one plan (-0.96 percent, P<0.05), and no significant difference in use in the other five plans (range, -0.38 percent to +0.23 percent; P>0.05 for each comparison). For beneficiaries who used mental health and substance-abuse services, spending attributable to the implementation of parity decreased significantly for three plans (range, -$201.99 to -$68.97; P<0.05 for each comparison) and did not change significantly for four plans (range, -$42.13 to +$27.11; P>0.05 for each comparison). The implementation of parity was associated with significant reductions in out-of-pocket spending in five of seven plans. CONCLUSIONS: When coupled with management of care, implementation of parity in insurance benefits for behavioral health care can improve insurance protection without increasing total costs.
引用
收藏
页码:1378 / 1386
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] *AG HLTH CAR POL R, 1993, PUBL AHCPR
  • [2] Interaction terms in logit and probit models
    Ai, CR
    Norton, EC
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 80 (01) : 123 - 129
  • [3] *AM PSYCH ASS, 2000, AM J PSYCHIAT S, V157, pS1
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1998, INTRO BOOTSTRAP
  • [5] *FEHB, 2004, FEHB HDB
  • [6] *FEHB, 2001, 200017 FEHB OFF PERS
  • [7] Will parity in coverage result in better mental health care?
    Frank, RG
    Goldman, HH
    McGuire, TG
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (23) : 1701 - 1704
  • [8] Frank RG, 2000, HDB HLTH EC
  • [9] EQUITY AND PARITY IN PSYCHIATRIC-CARE
    GOLDMAN, HH
    SHARFSTEIN, SS
    FRANK, RG
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS, 1983, 13 (06) : 488 - 491
  • [10] Costs and use of mental health services before and after managed care
    Goldman, W
    McCulloch, J
    Sturm, R
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1998, 17 (02) : 40 - 52