Development and evaluation of evidence based risk assessment tool (STRATIFY) to predict which elderly inpatients will fall: case-control and cohort studies

被引:488
作者
Oliver, D [1 ]
Britton, M [1 ]
Seed, P [1 ]
Martin, FC [1 ]
Hopper, AH [1 ]
机构
[1] UNITED MED & DENT SCH GUYS & ST THOMASS HOSP, DEPT STAT, DIV PUBL HLTH SCI, ST THOMAS HOSP, LONDON SE1 7EH, ENGLAND
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 1997年 / 315卷 / 7115期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.315.7115.1049
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To identify clinical characteristics of elderly inpatients that predict their chance of falling (phase 1) and to use these characteristics to derive a risk assessment tool and to evaluate its power in predicting falls (phases 2 and 3). Design: Phase 1: a prospective case-control study. Phases 2 and 3: prospective evaluations of the derived risk assessment tool in predicting falls in two cohorts. Setting: Elderly care units of St Thomas's Hospital (phase 1 and 2) and Kent and Canterbury Hospital (phase 3). Subjects: Elderly hospital inpatients (aged greater than or equal to 65 years): 116 cases and 116 controls in phase 1, 217 patients in phase 2, and 331 in phase 3. Main outcome measures: 21 separate clinical characteristics were assessed in phase 1, including the abbreviated mental test score, modified Barthel index, a transfer and mobility score obtained by combining the transfer and mobility sections of the Barthel index, and several nursing judgments. Results:In phase 1 five factors were independently associated with a higher risk of falls: fall as a presenting complaint (odds ratio 4.64 (95% confidence interval 2.59 to 8.33); a transfer and mobility score of 3 or 4 (2.10 (1.22 to 3.61)); and primary nurses' judgment that a patient was agitated (20.9 (9.62 to 45.62)), needed frequent toileting (2.48 (1.08 to 5.70)), and was visually impaired (3.56 (1.26 to 10.05)). A risk assessment score (range 0-5) was derived by scoring one point for each of these five factors. In phases 2 and 3 a risk assessment score >2 was used to define high risk: the sensitivity and specificity of the score to predict falls during the following week was 93% and 88% respectively in phase 2 and 92% and 68% respectively in phase 3. Conclusion: This simple risk assessment tool predicted with clinically useful sensitivity and specificity a high percentage of falls among elderly hospital inpatients.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1053
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PDQ EPIDEMIOLOGY
[2]  
Baker S P, 1985, Clin Geriatr Med, V1, P501
[3]   SERIOUS FALLS IN HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - CORRELATES AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION [J].
BATES, DW ;
PRUESS, K ;
SOUNEY, P ;
PLATT, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 99 (02) :137-143
[4]  
Brady R, 1993, J Gerontol Nurs, V19, P26
[5]  
Cannard G, 1996, Nurs Times, V92, P36
[6]  
Collin C, 1988, Int Disabil Stud, V10, P61
[7]  
DeVincenzo D K, 1987, Rehabil Nurs, V12, P248
[8]  
Gilleard C., 1984, AGE AGEING S4, V23, P17
[9]   An evaluation of risk factors for in-patient falls in acute and rehabilitation elderly care wards [J].
Gluck, T ;
Wientjes, HJFM ;
Rai, GS .
GERONTOLOGY, 1996, 42 (02) :104-107
[10]  
Hendrich A L, 1988, J Nurs Qual Assur, V3, P28