Lingual and biting responses to selected lipids by the lizard Podarcis lilfordi

Many lizards can identify, food using chemical cues, but very little is known about the chemical constituents used for this purpose. We experimentally investigated responses to several lipid stimuli by the omnivorous lacertid lizard Podarcis lilfordi, which had been shown previously to be capable of identifying prey using only chemical cues and to respond to pork fat by tongue-flicking and biting. In 60-s trials in which stimuli were presented on cotton swabs, the lizards responded very strongly to pure pork fat and to oleic acid. but not to cholesterol or glycerol. Latency to bite swabs, the number of individuals that bit swabs. and the tongue-flick attack score, TFAS(R), which combines effects of tongue-flicks and bites, showed stronger responses to fat than to cholesterol, glycerol, and distilled water but did not differ significantly from responses to oleic acid, Several lines of evidence show that oleic acid elicited strong chemosensory and feeding responses, For individuals that did not bite, the number of tongue-flicks,vas significantly greater for oleic acid than for distilled water or glycerol, and nearly so for cholesterol. Latency to bite was significantly shorter for oleic acid than for distilled water, and TFAS(R) was significantly greater for oleic acid than for distilled water and glycerol. In combination with pilot data indicating no strong response to the waxy, saturated palmitic acid, these findings suggest that oleic acid in particular and probably other unsaturated fatty acids found in animal fat contribute strongly to the food-related responses to lipids. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.