Patient-based health technology assessment: A vision of the future

被引:111
作者
Bridges, John F. P. [1 ]
Jones, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
health technology assessment (HTA); decision making; evidence-based medicine; patient preferences;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462307051549
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In conjunction with other important movements in contemporary medicine, including evidence-based medicine (EBM), health technology assessment (HTA) has promoted a culture of critical evaluation. Despite this impact, institutional and methodological challenges are associated with HTA. For example, only in recent years has HTA attempted an open dialogue with patients; however, this is normally done by giving them a "seat" at the HTA decision-making table, rather than by more scientific means. Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a working definition of patient-based HTA, to identify the current barriers to adopting a patient-based model, and to formulate a vision of how a patient-based HTA could be used to promote patient empowerment and patient-centered care. Results: In the ideal setting, a patient-based HTA would promote patient knowledge by providing access to information and promoting an informed dialogue between patients and their healthcare professionals. To implement a patient-based HTA, the focus must turn to the patient's issues and incorporate each patient's unique perspective and preferences. Processes must change to increase patient participation in all levels of HTA and aim to promote empowered patients who can make informed decisions. Conclusions: Present-day HTA is broad and has numerous stakeholders, with none so important as the patient. By asking patient-oriented questions in HTA and better involving patients throughout the entire process, we can easily promote patient empowerment, and as such make patients more capable to play a more active role in healthcare decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 35
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Banta D, 1978, ASSESSING EFFICACY S
[2]
Allies or enemies? Evidence-based medicine and consumer choice [J].
Bastian, H .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2000, 172 (01) :5-6
[3]
BASTTISTA RN, 2005, SCI BASIS HLTH SERVI, V99, P379
[4]
Battista RN, 1999, CAN MED ASSOC J, V160, P1464
[5]
Birch Stephen, 2006, J Health Serv Res Policy, V11, P46, DOI 10.1258/135581906775094235
[7]
Bridges John F P, 2003, Appl Health Econ Health Policy, V2, P213
[8]
Bridges John Fp, 2006, Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, V6, P19, DOI 10.1586/14737167.6.1.19
[9]
Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments -: Working group 4 report [J].
Busse, R ;
Orvain, J ;
Velasco, M ;
Perleth, M ;
Drummond, M ;
Gürtner, F ;
Jorgensen, T ;
Jovell, A ;
Malone, J ;
Rüther, A ;
Wild, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 18 (02) :361-422
[10]
Donaldson C, 2001, Health Expect, V4, P180, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00126.x