Indicator species analysis as a test of non-random distribution of species in the context of marine protected areas

被引:49
作者
Mouillot, D
Culioli, JM
Chi, TD
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier 2, ECOLAG, UMII 5119, CNRS,UMR, F-34095 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Reserve Nat Bouches de Bonifacio, Off Environm Corse, F-20250 Corte, France
关键词
artisanal fisheries; bioindicators; indicator species analysis; fish; marine protected areas; randomization areas;
D O I
10.1017/S0376892902000267
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Species are identified as bioindicators when their presence or abundance within sites of a particular habitat or a conservation area are high. Dufrene and Legendre (1997), Ecological Monographs 67: 345-366, proposed the use of a flexible asymmetrical approach to detect indicator species and species assemblages characterizing groups of sites, the indicator value for each species being subsequently tested by randomization. Although the advantages of these methods in comparison to other multivariate or two-way indicator species analyses have been demonstrated, relatively few ecological studies have made use of them. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the advantages of the indicator species test using a data set generate by traditional fisheries activities at four areas in the Bonifacio Strait Marine Reserve, Corsica, France. ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis and another randomization test were also performed on the same data set. the 54 species caught in the fishing nets, the indicator species analyses identified 19 species for which the indicator value was significant for a given area, whereas the a posteriori Tukey test for ANOVA detected only 12 species for which the mass capture per unit effort was significantly greater for a given area. The efficiency of this new approach within the framework of conservation and marine reserve studies is demonstrated by focusing on three species (Sciaena umbra, Palinurus elephas and Maja verrucosa).
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 390
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Cultural and socio-economic impacts of Mediterranean marine protected areas [J].
Badalamenti, F ;
Ramos, AA ;
Voultsiadou, E ;
Lizaso, LJS ;
D'Anna, G ;
Pipitone, C ;
Mas, J ;
Fernandez, JAR ;
Whitmarsh, D ;
Riggio, S .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2000, 27 (02) :110-125
[2]  
Bauchot ML, 1980, GUIDE POISSONS MARIN
[3]   COMPARING 3 CLASSIFICATION STRATEGIES FOR USE IN ECOLOGY [J].
BELBIN, L ;
MCDONALD, C .
JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (03) :341-348
[4]  
BOX GEP, 1953, BIOMETRIKA, V40, P318, DOI 10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.318
[5]   Gradients in coral reef fish density and size across the Barbados Marine Reserve boundary: effects of reserve protection and habitat characteristics [J].
Chapman, MR ;
Kramer, DL .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1999, 181 :81-96
[6]   Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures [J].
Chytry, M ;
Tichy, L ;
Holt, J ;
Botta-Dukát, Z .
JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (01) :79-90
[7]   NONPARAMETRIC MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES OF CHANGES IN COMMUNITY STRUCTURE [J].
CLARKE, KR .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1993, 18 (01) :117-143
[8]  
CULIOLI JM, 1994, TRAVAUX SCI PARC NAT, V52, P1
[9]   Collembolan assemblages in Lesvos, Greece. Effects of differences in vegetation and precipitation [J].
Detsis, V ;
Diamantopoulos, J ;
Kosmas, C .
ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2000, 21 (02) :149-159
[10]  
Dufrene M, 1997, ECOL MONOGR, V67, P345, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:SAAIST]2.0.CO