Zero-dimensional noise: The best mask you never saw

被引:27
作者
Baker, Daniel H. [1 ]
Meese, Tim S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Sch Life & Hlth Sci, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
来源
JOURNAL OF VISION | 2012年 / 12卷 / 10期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
noise masking; contrast detection; gain control; suppression; human vision; CROSS-ORIENTATION SUPPRESSION; VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION; CONTRAST DISCRIMINATION; INTERNAL NOISE; EXTERNAL NOISE; HUMAN VISION; SUMMATION; LUMINANCE; UNCERTAINTY; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1167/12.10.20
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
The transmission of weak signals through the visual system is limited by internal noise. Its level can be estimated by adding external noise, which increases the variance within the detecting mechanism, causing masking. But experiments with white noise fail to meet three predictions: (a) noise has too small an influence on the slope of the psychometric function, (b) masking occurs even when the noise sample is identical in each two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) interval, and (c) double-pass consistency is too low. We show that much of the energy of 2D white noise masks extends well beyond the pass-band of plausible detecting mechanisms and that this suppresses signal activity. These problems are avoided by restricting the external noise energy to the target mechanisms by introducing a pedestal with a mean contrast of 0% and independent contrast jitter in each 2AFC interval (termed zero-dimensional [0D] noise). We compared the jitter condition to masking from 2D white noise in double-pass masking and (novel) contrast matching experiments. Zero-dimensional noise produced the strongest masking, greatest double-pass consistency, and no suppression of perceived contrast, consistent with a noisy ideal observer. Deviations from this behavior for 2D white noise were explained by cross-channel suppression with no need to appeal to induced internal noise or uncertainty. We conclude that (a) results from previous experiments using white pixel noise should be re-evaluated and (b) 0D noise provides a cleaner method for investigating internal variability than pixel noise. Ironically then, the best external noise stimulus does not look noisy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Ahumada AJ, 1997, J OPT SOC AM A, V14, P2471, DOI 10.1364/JOSAA.14.002471
[2]   Same calculation efficiency but different internal noise for luminance- and contrast-modulated stimuli detection [J].
Allard, Remy ;
Faubert, Jocelyn .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2006, 6 (04) :322-334
[4]   Isolation and interaction of ON and OFF pathways in human vision: Contrast discrimination at pattern offset [J].
Bowen, RW .
VISION RESEARCH, 1997, 37 (02) :185-198
[5]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[6]   Cross-orientation suppression in human visual cortex [J].
Brouwer, Gijs Joost ;
Heeger, David J. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 106 (05) :2108-2119
[7]   VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION .4. OBSERVER INCONSISTENCY [J].
BURGESS, AE ;
COLBORNE, B .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1988, 5 (04) :617-627
[8]   Visual signal detectability with two noise components: Anomalous masking effects [J].
Burgess, AE ;
Li, X ;
Abbey, CK .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1997, 14 (09) :2420-2442
[9]   SUMMATION AND DIVISION BY NEURONS IN PRIMATE VISUAL-CORTEX [J].
CARANDINI, M ;
HEEGER, DJ .
SCIENCE, 1994, 264 (5163) :1333-1336
[10]   Evidence for two interacting temporal channels in human visual processing [J].
Cass, John ;
Alais, David .
VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (18) :2859-2868