Foregrounding the Disciplines for Teacher Preparation in Secondary Literacy

被引:14
作者
Conley, Mark W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
关键词
Content literacy; Specific subject areas (math; art; etc; Digital; media literacies; New literacies; Teacher education; professional development; Preservice; To learners in which of the following categories does your work apply; Early adolescence; Adolescence;
D O I
10.1002/JAAL.00115
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Though there has been disagreement about the particular emphasis on the disciplines with literacy, there is a great deal of agreement that the disciplines matter. This article describes a course designed to prepare beginning teachers to engage in disciplinary literacy, or literacy-related ways of knowing in a discipline. After researching a topic within their discipline, considering approaches to engage students in challenging texts and contemplating ways in which students might be challenged or struggle with a set of disciplinary ideas, teacher candidates guided in decisions about literacy goals and practices. By following this sequence, beginning teachers move from an over-emphasis on pedagogy to connecting specific literacy practices to disciplinary contexts. The promise of this approach is that beginning teachers are more likely to understand relationships between disciplinary contexts and literacy and, as a result, will be more likely to sustain a focus on disciplinary literacy.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 150
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Transformations in Educator Preparation: Effectiveness and Accountability, (2011)
[2]  
Conley M., Cognitive strategy instruction for adolescents: What we know about the promise, what we don't know about the potential, Harvard Educational Review, 78, 1, pp. 84-106, (2008)
[3]  
Conley M., Comprehension for what? Preparing students for their meaningful future, Theory into Practice, 50, 2, pp. 93-99, (2011)
[4]  
Draper R., Redefining content-area literacy teacher education: Finding my voice through collaboration, Harvard Educational Review, 78, 1, pp. 60-83, (2008)
[5]  
Draper R., Broomhead P., Jensen A., Nokes J., Siebert D., Reimagining Content-Area Literacy Instruction, (2010)
[6]  
Fairbanks C., Duffy G., Faircloth B., Ye B., Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others, Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 1-2, pp. 161-171, (2010)
[7]  
Heller R., In praise of amateurism: A friendly critique of Moje's call for change in secondary literacy, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54, 4, pp. 267-273, (2010)
[8]  
Kose S., Diagnosing student misconceptions: Using drawing as a research method, World Applied Sciences Journal, 3, 2, pp. 283-293, (2008)
[9]  
Lee C., Culture, Literacy, and Learning: Blooming in the Midst of the Whirlwind, (2007)
[10]  
Lee C., Spratley A., Reading in the Disciplines: The Challenges of Adolescent Literacy, (2010)