Carcinogenicity testing and the evaluation of regulatory requirements for pharmaceuticals

The results of rat and mouse carcinogenicity studies for 282 human pharmaceuticals in the FDA database were analyzed and compared as part of an International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) evaluation of rodent carcinogenicity studies and their utility for carcinogenicity testing. A majority of the carcinogenicity studies in the FDA database were carried out in Sprague-Dawley-derived rats and Swiss-Webster-derived CD-1 mice in contrast to Fisher 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice employed in National Toxicology Program (NTP) studies. Despite the differences in rodent strains, the relative proportion of compounds with positive findings (44.3%) and the degree of overall concordance between rats and mice (74.1%) in the FDA database were similar to the NTP rodent carcinogenicity database. Carcinogenicity studies in two rodent species are necessary primarily to identify trans-species tumorigens, which are considered to pose a relatively greater potential risk to humans than single species positive compounds. Two-year carcinogenicity studies in both rats and mice may not be the only means of identifying transspecies tumorigens. Sufficient experience is now available for some alternative in vivo carcinogenicity models to support their application as complementary studies in combination with a single 2-year carcinogenicity study to identify trans-species tumorigens. Our analysis of the rodent carcinogenicity studies supports such an approach for assessing carcinogenic potential without compromising the public health. (C) 1997 Academic Press.