Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT

被引:327
作者
Coll, DM
Varanelli, MJ
Smith, RC
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Radiol, Weill Med Coll, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.178.1.1780101
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Prior studies using radiography have examined the relationship of ureteral stone size and location to the probability of spontaneous passage. Given the improved accuracy and new role of unenhanced CT in the diagnosis of acute ureterolithiasis, we studied the relationship of stone size and location as determined by unenhanced CT to the rate of spontaneous passage. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Over a 29-month period, 850 patients with acute flank pain were evaluated with unenhanced CT. Confirmation of the CT diagnosis was obtained retrospectively for 172 patients with ureteral stones: 115 stones passed spontaneously and 57 required intervention. Stone size was defined as the maximum diameter within the plane of the axial CT section. Stone location was classified as proximal ureter (above the sacroiliac joints), mid ureter (overlying the sacroiliac joints), distal ureter (below the sacroiliac joints), and ureterovesical junction. RESULTS. The spontaneous passage rate for stones 1 mm diameter was 87%; for stones 2-4 nun, 76%; for stones 5-7 mm, 60%; for stones 7-9 mm 48%; and for stones larger than 9 mm, 25%. Spontaneous passage rate as a function of stone location was 48% for stones in the proximal ureter, 60% for mid ureteral stones, 75% for distal stones, and 79% for ureterovesical junction stones. CONCLUSION. The rate of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones does vary with stone size and location as determined by CT. These rates are similar to those previously published based on radiography.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 103
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Nonopaque crystal deposition causing ureteric obstruction in patients with HIV undergoing indinavir therapy [J].
Blake, SP ;
McNicholas, MMJ ;
Raptopoulos, V .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (03) :717-720
[2]  
Fox M, 1965, Br J Urol, V37, P660, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1965.tb09658.x
[3]   OBSERVATIONS ON ANALYSIS OF 10 THOUSAND URINARY CALCULI [J].
HERRING, LC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1962, 88 (04) :545-&
[4]  
HUBNER WA, 1993, EUR UROL, V24, P172
[5]   URETEROSCOPY AND URETERAL CALCULI - HOW USEFUL [J].
KINDER, RB ;
OSBORN, DE ;
FLYNN, JT ;
SMART, JG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 60 (06) :506-508
[6]   URETERAL CALCULI - NATURAL-HISTORY AND TREATMENT IN AN ERA OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY [J].
MORSE, RM ;
RESNICK, MI .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (02) :263-265
[7]   COMPARISON OF RADIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT AND ACTUAL SIZE OF URETERAL CALCULI [J].
OTNES, B ;
SANDNES, H .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1978, 12 (02) :155-156
[8]  
SANDEGARD E, 1958, Acta Chir Scand, V116, P44
[9]  
SANDEGARD E, 1956, ACTA CHIR SCAND S, V219
[10]   Ureteral stones clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi [J].
Segura, JW ;
Preminger, GM ;
Assimos, DG ;
Dretler, SP ;
Kahn, RI ;
Lingeman, JE ;
Macaluso, JN .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (05) :1915-1921