Allogeneic sensitization is more effective than xenogeneic sensitization in eliciting gal-mediated skin graft rejection

被引:21
作者
Gock, H
Murray-Segal, L
Salvaris, E
Cowan, P
D'Apice, AJF
机构
[1] St Vincents Hosp, Immunol Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, St Vincents Hosp, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.TP.0000116420.17173.E4
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The generation of Gal knockout (KO) pigs is likely to be an important advance in xenotransplantation. However, recent reports suggesting that expression of Gal may not be completely eliminated raise the possibility of a continuing anti-Gal immune response. The authors used a Gal-mismatched skin graft model to study cell-mediated anti-Gal rejection. Gal KO mice on a BALB/c or C57BL/6 background were sensitized with allogeneic or xenogeneic (rat) Gal-positive skin grafts and underwent transplantation with a secondary skin graft solely mismatched for Gal 21 days later. Most allograft-sensitized recipients rejected the secondary graft (n=26 [96%]) compared with less than half of xenograft-sensitized recipients (n=25 [44%]). An immunoglobulin (Ig) M response was detected in some xenograft-sensitized but not allograft-sensitized recipients. No recipients developed detectable anti-Gal IgG. The authors' findings contrast with previous reports that xenografts are more potent than allografts in eliciting an anti-Gal response and suggest that a predominantly cell-mediated response can mediate rejection.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 753
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Targeted disruption of the α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene in cloned pigs [J].
Dai, YF ;
Vaught, TD ;
Boone, J ;
Chen, SH ;
Phelps, CJ ;
Ball, S ;
Monahan, JA ;
Jobst, PM ;
McCreath, KJ ;
Lamborn, AE ;
Cowell-Lucero, JL ;
Wells, KD ;
Colman, A ;
Polejaeva, IA ;
Ayares, DL .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 20 (03) :251-255
[2]   Gal mismatch alone causes skin graft rejection in mice [J].
Gock, H ;
Murray-Segal, L ;
Salvaris, E ;
Cowan, PJ ;
d'Apice, AJF .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (05) :637-645
[3]  
ISHIOKA GY, 1992, J IMMUNOL, V148, P2446
[4]   Production of α-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer coning [J].
Lai, LX ;
Kolber-Simonds, D ;
Park, KW ;
Cheong, HT ;
Greenstein, JL ;
Im, GS ;
Samuel, M ;
Bonk, A ;
Rieke, A ;
Day, BN ;
Murphy, CN ;
Carter, DB ;
Hawley, RJ ;
Prather, RS .
SCIENCE, 2002, 295 (5557) :1089-1092
[5]  
McKenzie IFC, 1998, J IMMUNOL, V161, P5116
[6]   Production of α1,3-galactosyltransferase-deficient pigs [J].
Phelps, CJ ;
Koike, C ;
Vaught, TD ;
Boone, J ;
Wells, KD ;
Chen, SH ;
Ball, S ;
Specht, SM ;
Polejaeva, IA ;
Monahan, JA ;
Jobst, PM ;
Sharma, SB ;
Lamborn, AE ;
Garst, AS ;
Moore, M ;
Demetris, AJ ;
Rudert, WA ;
Bottino, R ;
Bertera, S ;
Trucco, M ;
Starzl, TE ;
Dai, YF ;
Ayares, DL .
SCIENCE, 2003, 299 (5605) :411-414
[7]   Pig cells that lack the gene for α1-3 galactosyltransferase express low levels of the gal antigen [J].
Sharma, A ;
Naziruddin, B ;
Cui, C ;
Martin, MJ ;
Xu, H ;
Wan, H ;
Lei, Y ;
Harrison, C ;
Yin, J ;
Okabe, J ;
Mathews, C ;
Stark, A ;
Adams, CS ;
Houtz, J ;
Wiseman, BS ;
Byrne, GW ;
Logan, JS .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (04) :430-436
[8]   Differential immune responses to α-gal epitopes on xenografts and allografts:: implications for accommodation in xenotransplantation [J].
Tanemura, M ;
Yin, DP ;
Chong, AS ;
Galili, U .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2000, 105 (03) :301-310
[9]   Differential expression of α-gal epitopes (Galα1-3Galβ1-4GlcNac-R) on pig and mouse organs [J].
Tanemura, M ;
Maruyama, S ;
Galili, U .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (01) :187-190
[10]   Characterization of the rat α(1,3)galactosyltransferase:: evidence for two independent genes encoding glycosyltransferases that synthesize Galα(1,3)Gal by two separate glycosylation pathways [J].
Taylor, SG ;
McKenzie, IFC ;
Sandrin, MS .
GLYCOBIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (05) :327-337