Can a back pain e-mail discussion group improve health status and lower health care costs?

被引:147
作者
Lorig, KR
Laurent, DD
Deyo, RA
Marnell, ME
Minor, MA
Ritter, PL
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Stanford, CA USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Phys Therapy, Columbia, SC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.162.7.792
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Given the high health care utilization, limited evidence for the effectiveness of back pain interventions, and the proliferation of e-mail health discussion groups, this study seeks to determine if the Internet can be used to improve health status and health care utilization for people with chronic back pain. Methods: Randomized controlled trial. Participants included 580 people from 49 states with chronic back pain having at least I outpatient visit in the past year, no "redflag" symptoms, and access to e-mail. Major exclusion criteria included continuous back pain for more than 90 days causing major activity intolerance and/or receiving disability payments. Intervention: Closed, moderated, e-mail discussion group. Participants also received a book and videotape about back pain. Controls received a subscription to a non-health-related magazine of their choice. Main Outcome Measures Pain, disability, role function, health distress, and health care utilization. Results: At 1-year treatment, subjects compared with controls demonstrated improvements in pain (P=.045), disability (P=.02), role function (P=.007), and health distress (P=.001). Physician visits for the past 6 months declined by 1.5 visits for the treatment group and by 0.65 visits for the control group (P=.07). Mean hospital days declined nearly 0.20 days for the treated group vs and increased 0.04 days for the control group (P=.24). Conclusions: An e-mail discussion group can positively affect health status and possibly health care utilization. It may have a place in the treatment of chronic recurrent back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:792 / 796
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   MEASURING THE FUNCTIONAL STATUS OF PATIENTS WITH LOW-BACK-PAIN - ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF 4 DISEASE-SPECIFIC QUESTIONNAIRES [J].
BEURSKENS, AJ ;
DEVET, HC ;
KOKE, AJ ;
VANDERHEIJDEN, GJ ;
KNIPSCHILD, PG .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (09) :1017-1028
[2]  
Bigos S., 1994, Clinical practice guideline
[3]   GROUP EDUCATION INTERVENTIONS FOR PEOPLE WITH LOW-BACK-PAIN - AN OVERVIEW OF THE LITERATURE [J].
COHEN, JE ;
GOEL, V ;
FRANK, JW ;
BOMBARDIER, C ;
PELOSO, P ;
GUILLEMIN, F .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (11) :1214-1222
[4]   ILLNESS INTRUSIVENESS AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN END-STAGE RENAL-DISEASE - COMPARISON AND STABILITY ACROSS TREATMENT MODALITIES [J].
DEVINS, GM ;
MANDIN, H ;
HONS, RB ;
BURGESS, ED ;
KLASSEN, J ;
TAUB, K ;
SCHORR, S ;
LETOURNEAU, PK ;
BUCKLE, S .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 9 (02) :117-142
[5]   EFFICACY OF COMPREHENSIVE REHABILITATION PROGRAMS AND BACK SCHOOL FOR PATIENTS WITH LOW-BACK-PAIN - A METAANALYSIS [J].
DIFABIO, RP .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1995, 75 (10) :865-878
[6]  
FERGUSON T, 1999, NEWSLETTER ONLIN APR
[7]   Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure [J].
Fischer, D ;
Stewart, AL ;
Bloch, DA ;
Lorig, K ;
Laurent, D ;
Holman, H .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (12) :1157-1162
[8]   TRANSLATION AND VALIDATION OF ARTHRITIS OUTCOME MEASURES INTO SPANISH [J].
GONZALEZ, VM ;
STEWART, A ;
RITTER, PL ;
LORIG, K .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1995, 38 (10) :1429-1446
[9]  
Moore JE, 1999, BACK PAIN HELPBOOK
[10]   Self-reports of health care utilization compared to provider records [J].
Ritter, PL ;
Stewart, AL ;
Kaymaz, H ;
Sobel, DS ;
Block, DA ;
Lorig, KR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (02) :136-141