A Multidimensional Tool to Quantify Treatment Resistance in Depression: The Maudsley Staging Method

被引:195
作者
Fekadu, Abebaw [1 ]
Wooderson, Sarah [1 ]
Donaldson, Catherine [1 ]
Markopoulou, Kalypso
Masterson, Brendan [2 ]
Poon, Lucia [2 ]
Cleare, Anthony J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Sect Neurobiol Mood Disorders, Dept Psychol Med & Psychiat, London SE5 8AZ, England
[2] Bethlem Royal & Maudsley Hosp, S London & Maudsley Natl Hlth Serv Fdn Trust, London, England
关键词
STAR-ASTERISK-D; MAJOR DEPRESSION; UNITED-STATES; PRIMARY-CARE; PREDICTORS; PREVALENCE; FLUOXETINE; RECOVERY; OUTCOMES; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.4088/JCP.08m04309
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: Treatment resistance is a common clinical phenomenon in depression. However, current unitary models of staging fail to represent its complexity. We aimed to devise a model to stage treatment-resistant depression, taking into account the core factors contributing to treatment failure. Method: We reviewed the literature to identify factors consistently associated with treatment resistance. We also analyzed data from a subgroup of patients discharged from a specialist inpatient unit for whom adequate data were obtainable. Results: We present a points-based staging model incorporating 3 factors: treatment, severity of illness, and duration of presenting episode. In this model, the rating of symptom severity ranges from subsyndromal depression (score 1) to severe syndromal depression with psychosis (score 5). Antidepressant treatment is rated on a 5-point subscale based on number of medications used, While duration of the presenting episode is rated on a 3-point subscale. The overall level of resistance estimated using this model varies from minimal resistance (score of 3) to severe resistance (score of 15). The rating system allows the overall severity of treatment resistance to be summarized either as a single numeric score or under a single descriptive category. It may also be possible to specify categories (mild, moderate, and severe) based on severity of resistance. Analysis of inpatient data indicates that the factors incorporated in the model and the model itself have some predictive validity. Conclusion: This staging model has reasonable face and predictive validity and may have better utility in staging treatment resistance than currently available methods.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 184
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Alonso J, 2004, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V109, P21
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2000, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU
[3]  
[Anonymous], MANAGEMENT MENTAL DI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, The world health report-mental health: New understanding, new hope
[5]   Definition, assessment, and staging of treatment-resistant refractory major depression: A review of current concepts and methods [J].
Berlim, Marcelo T. ;
Turecki, Gustavo .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2007, 52 (01) :46-54
[6]  
BLAZER DG, 1994, AM J PSYCHIAT, V151, P979
[7]   Severity and duration of depression, not personality factors, predict short term outcome in the treatment of major depression [J].
Blom, Marc B. J. ;
Spinhoven, Philip ;
Hoffman, Tonko ;
Jonker, Kosse ;
Hoencamp, Erik ;
Haffmans, P. M. Judith ;
van Dyck, Richard .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2007, 104 (1-3) :119-126
[8]   Predictors of response to lithium augmentation in tricyclic antidepressant-resistant depression [J].
Bschor, T ;
Canata, B ;
Müller-Oerlinghausen, B ;
Bauer, M .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2001, 64 (2-3) :261-265
[9]   Predicting the onset of major depression in subjects with subthreshold depression in primary care: a prospective study [J].
Cuijpers, P ;
Smit, F ;
Willemse, G .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 111 (02) :133-138
[10]   Prediction of response to ECT with routinely collected data in major depression [J].
de Vreede, IM ;
Burger, H ;
van Vliet, IM .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2005, 86 (2-3) :323-327