Randomized double-blind study comparing the efficacy of gabapentin with amitriptyline on diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain

被引:268
作者
Morello, CM
Leckband, SG
Stoner, CP
Moorhouse, DF
Sahagian, GA
机构
[1] Vet Affairs San Diego Healthcare Syst, Pharm Serv 119, San Diego, CA 92161 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosci, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.159.16.1931
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Reports of gabapentin use in diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain stimulate a need for controlled trials to determine its comparative efficacy to the therapeutic standard of amitriptyline hydrochloride. Objective: To determine the efficacy of gabapentin compared with amitriptyline in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain. Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study. Setting: Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, Ambulatory Care Clinic. Patients: Twenty-eight veterans were referred by their primary care providers. Two patients withdrew before randomization because of no neuropathic pain after washout; a third withdrew for unexpected surgery that required analgesics. Three patients withdrew because of adverse effects and 1 for protocol violation. Interventions: Patients with stable glycemic control and neuropathic gain randomized to 6 weeks of therapy with gabapentin, 900 to 1800 mg/d, or amitriptyline hydrochloride; 25 to 75 mg/d, with a 1-week washout before crossover. Main Outcome Measures: Pain relief measured by pain scale with verbal descriptors and global pain score assessment at treatment end. Results: Participants and investigators were blinded throughout. Mean dosages were of gabapentin, 1565 mg/d, and of amitriptyline hydrochloride, 59 mg/d. Sixty-five percent of patients reached maximum dose with gabapentin and 54% with amitriptyline. Mean score diary analysis showed pain relief with gabapentin and amitriptyline was not significantly different (P =.26). Global data were obtained from 21 of 25; enrolled patients who completed the study. Moderate or greater pain relief was experienced in 11 (52%) of 21 patients with gabapentin and 14 (67%) of 21 patients with amitriptyline. There were no significant period or carry-over effects (P=.35). Conclusions: Although both drugs provide pain relief, mean pain score and global pain score data indicate no significant difference between gabapentin and amitriptyline. Gabapentin may be an alternative for treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain, yet does not appear to offer considerable advantage over amitriptyline and is more expensive. Larger trials are necessary to define gabapentin's place in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain.
引用
收藏
页码:1931 / 1937
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Gabapentin for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Backonja, M ;
Beydoun, A ;
Edwards, KR ;
Schwartz, SL ;
Fonseca, V ;
Hes, M ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Garofalo, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (21) :1831-1836
[2]  
Chadwick David, 1995, P851
[3]   PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
GAULT, MH .
NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) :31-41
[4]   Drug therapy - New antiepileptic drugs [J].
Dichter, MA ;
Brodie, MJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (24) :1583-1590
[5]  
DONOFRIO P, 1991, ARCH INTERN MED, V151, P2225
[6]   NEW UNDERSTANDING AND TREATMENT OF DIABETIC NEUROPATHY [J].
DYCK, PJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (19) :1287-1288
[7]   Gabapentin (neurontin) and S-(+)-3-isobutylgaba represent a novel class of selective antihyperalgesic agents [J].
Field, MJ ;
Oles, RJ ;
Lewis, AS ;
McCleary, S ;
Hughes, J ;
Singh, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 121 (08) :1513-1522
[8]   IMPORTANCE OF BETA, TYPE-II ERROR AND SAMPLE-SIZE IN DESIGN AND INTERPRETATION OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL - SURVEY OF 71 NEGATIVE TRIALS [J].
FREIMAN, JA ;
CHALMERS, TC ;
SMITH, H ;
KUEBLER, RR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 299 (13) :690-694
[9]   RATIO SCALES OF SENSORY AND AFFECTIVE VERBAL PAIN DESCRIPTORS [J].
GRACELY, RH ;
MCGRATH, P ;
DUBNER, R .
PAIN, 1978, 5 (01) :5-18
[10]   NARCOTIC ANALGESIA - FENTANYL REDUCES THE INTENSITY BUT NOT THE UNPLEASANTNESS OF PAINFUL TOOTH-PULP SENSATIONS [J].
GRACELY, RH ;
DUBNER, R ;
MCGRATH, PA .
SCIENCE, 1979, 203 (4386) :1261-1263