Edge effects and ecological traps: Effects on shrubland birds in Missouri

被引:45
作者
Woodward, AA
Fink, AD
Thompson, FR
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, US Forest Serv, N Cent Res Stn, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
Cardinalis cardinalis; Dendroica discolor; ecological traps; edge effects; field sparrow; Icteria virens; indigo bunting; Missouri; nest predation; northern cardinal; Passerina cyanea; prairie warbler; Spizella pusilla; yellow-breasted chat;
D O I
10.2307/3803018
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The effect of habitat edge on avian nesting Success has been the focus of considerable debate. We studied relationships between habitat edges, locations of nests, and predation. We tested the ecological trap hypothesis for 5 shrubland bird species in the Missouri Ozarks. We compared habitat selection and daily nest predation rates among 3 distance-to-edge categories. Edge effects were species specific. Indigo bunting (Passerina cyanea) and northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) preferred nest sites that were close (less than or equal to 20 m) to habitat edges. Yellow-breasted chat (Icteria virens) and prairie warbler (Dendroica discolor) preferred nest sites >20 in front the edge. Field sparrow (Spizella pusilla) used habitat in proportion to availability. Daily nest predation varied by as much as 200-300% among distance-to-edge categories but did not decrease monotonically with distance front edge. The nest predation models without distance-to-edge categories were ranked the best models based on Akaike's Information Criterion: however, Akaike weights indicated some support for alternative models with distance-to-edge categories. Edges did not act as ecological traps for shrubland birds in this study because habitat preference was not positively correlated with nest predation across the 3 distance-to-edge categories. Researchers and land managers should not assume that shrubland birds respond to edges in the same way that forest species respond to edges. Furthermore, species with similar nesting ecology do not necessarily have similar nest-site preferences or nest predation rates in relation to distance to habitat edges.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 675
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF SOME STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR ANALYSIS OF RESOURCE SELECTION [J].
ALLDREDGE, JR ;
RATTI, JT .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1986, 50 (01) :157-165
[2]   Null hypothesis testing: Problems, prevalence, and an alternative [J].
Anderson, DR ;
Burnham, KP ;
Thompson, WL .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2000, 64 (04) :912-923
[3]  
Andren H., 1995, MOSAIC LANDSCAPES EC, P225
[4]   Forest bird response to regeneration practices in central hardwood forests [J].
Annand, EM ;
Thompson, FR .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1997, 61 (01) :159-171
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, RESTORING N AM BIRDS, DOI DOI 10.12987/9780300127119
[6]  
[Anonymous], WILDLIFE MONOGRAPHS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, PARTNERS FLIGHT CONS
[8]  
Askins Robert A., 1998, Restoration & Management Notes, V16, P166
[9]  
BEST L B, 1986, Wildlife Society Bulletin, V14, P308
[10]  
BOLLINGER EK, 1992, ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION OF NEOTROPICAL MIGRANT LANDBIRDS, P497