National Forest Inventory Contributions to Forest Biodiversity Monitoring

被引:93
作者
Chirici, Gherardo [1 ]
McRoberts, Ronald E. [3 ]
Winter, Susanne [2 ]
Bertini, Roberta [4 ]
Braendli, Urs-Beat
Asensio, Iciar Alberdi
Bastrup-Birk, Annemarie [5 ]
Rondeux, Jacques [6 ]
Barsoum, Nadia
Marchetti, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Molise, I-86090 Pesche, Isernia, Italy
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Dresden, Germany
[3] US Forest Serv, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Florence, I-50121 Florence, Italy
[5] Univ Copenhagen, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Univ Liege, Gembloux Agrobiotech, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
关键词
COST Action E43; international references; harmonization; biodiversity indicator; naturalness; forest type; deadwood; forest age; regeneration; STAND STRUCTURE; BEECH FORESTS; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; ASSOCIATIONS; DEFINITIONS; VEGETATION; TEMPERATE; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.5849/forsci.12-003
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Forests are the most biodiverse terrestrial ecosystems. National forest inventories (NFIs) are the main source of information on the status and trends of forests, but they have traditionally been designed to assess land coverage and the production value of forests rather than forest biodiversity. The primary international processes dealing with biodiversity and sustainable forest management, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Forest Europe, Streamlining European Biodiversity Indicators 2010 of the European Environmental Agency, and the Montreal Process, all include indicators related to forest biodiversity. The scope of this article is to review and present possibilities offered by NFIs to harmonize estimation of indicators useful for international forest biodiversity monitoring and reporting. We summarize key findings from Working Group 3 of Action E43 ("Harmonisation of National Forest Inventories in Europe: Techniques for Common Reporting") of the European program Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST). We discuss definitions and techniques for harmonizing estimates of possible biodiversity indicators based on data from NFIs in Europe and the United States. We compare these possible indicators with indicators selected by international processes. The results demonstrate that NFIs can report comparable or harmonized estimates of indicators for multiple biodiversity features (forest categories, deadwood, forest age, forest structure, and forest naturalness), but for others (ground vegetation and regeneration) NFIs should invest more in harmonization efforts. On the basis of these key findings, we recommend that NFIs should represent a main component of a future global biodiversity monitoring network as urgently requested by the CBD. FOR. SCI. 58(3):257-268.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 268
页数:12
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   The natural imperative for biological conservation [J].
Angermeier, PL .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (02) :373-381
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1965, PLANT SOCIOLOGY STUD
[3]  
[Anonymous], ECOL B
[4]  
[Anonymous], INVENTAIRE FORESTIER
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 112007 EEA
[6]  
[Anonymous], INTEGRATED TOOLS NAT
[7]   A forest typology for monitoring sustainable forest management: The case of European Forest Types [J].
Barbati, A. ;
Corona, P. ;
Marchetti, M. .
PLANT BIOSYSTEMS, 2007, 141 (01) :93-103
[8]  
Bartha D., 2006, Acta Silvatica & Lignaria Hungarica, V2, P7
[9]  
BIODIVERSITY INDICATORS PARTNERSHIP, 2011, 2010 BIP BIOD IND
[10]   A new approach to forest biodiversity monitoring in Canada [J].
Boutin, Stan ;
Haughland, Diane L. ;
Schieck, Jim ;
Herbers, Jim ;
Bayne, Erin .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 258 :S168-S175