Sources and flows of embodied CO2 emissions in import and export trade of China

被引:6
作者
Li Yanmei [1 ]
Fu Jiafeng [2 ]
Ma Zhanyun [2 ]
Yang Bo [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Inst Recycling Econ, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Acad Social Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
export trade; import trade; embodied CO2 emissions; input-output; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; CONSUMPTION; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11769-013-0644-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper uses the Global Trade Analysis Project (version 7) database to calculate embodied CO2 emissions in bilateral trade between China and other countries (regions) based on input-output methods. The sources and flows of embodied CO2 emissions in import and export trade of China are analyzed. Results show that the flows of embodied CO2 emissions in export trade are highly concentrated. The main flows to the United States (US) and Japan account for 1/4 and 1/7 of the total CO2 emissions in export trade, respectively. Concentrated flows of total exports and small differences in export structure are the main reasons for the highly concentrated export trade. The sources of embodied CO2 emissions in import trade have relatively low concentration. Taiwan Province of China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China, US, Russia, Republic of Korea, and Japan account for around 7.72%-12.67% of the total embodied CO2 emissions in import trade. The relative dispersion of import sources, the impact of the import structure, and the level of production technology in importing countries caused low concentration of CO2 emissions in import trade. Overall, the embodied CO2 emissions in the export trade of China are higher than those in import trade. As a result, production-based CO2 emissions are higher than consumption-based CO2 emissions. The difference of 8.96 x 10(8) t of CO2, which comes mainly from the US, Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom, accounts for 58.70% of the total difference. Some suggestions, such as improving energy efficiency, alerting high carbon-intensive industries transfer, expanding the market for sharing risks, and prompting the accounting system of consumption-based CO2 emissions, are proposed based on the results.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 230
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Ahmad N., 2003, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 15, DOI [10.1787/421482436815, DOI 10.1787/421482436815]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Int. Environ. Agreement: Polit. Law Econ., DOI [DOI 10.1023/B:INEA.0000005767.67689.28, 10.1023/B:INEA.0000005767.67689.28]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, INT EC, DOI DOI 10.1080/10168730100080032
[4]   Rethinking the Kyoto emissions targets [J].
Babiker, MH ;
Eckaus, RS .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2002, 54 (04) :399-414
[5]  
Fu Jiafeng, 2009, RESOURCE DEV MARKET, V25, P602
[6]  
Grubb M, 2004, INT REV ENV STRATEGI, V4, P163
[7]   CO2 emissions in Japan:: Influences of imports and exports [J].
Kondo, Y ;
Moriguchi, Y ;
Shimizu, H .
APPLIED ENERGY, 1998, 59 (2-3) :163-174
[8]  
Lenzen M., 2004, Economic Systems Research, V16, P391, DOI [10.1080/0953531042000304272, DOI 10.1080/0953531042000304272]
[9]  
Li Liping, 2008, ENV PROTECTION, V392, P62
[10]  
[李艳梅 Li Yanmei], 2010, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population·Resources and Environment], V20, P53