Musculoskeletal function assessment instrument: Criterion and construct validity

被引:159
作者
Engelberg, R [1 ]
Martin, DP [1 ]
Agel, J [1 ]
Obremsky, W [1 ]
Coronado, G [1 ]
Swiontkowski, MF [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON,DEPT HLTH SERV,SEATTLE,WA 98195
关键词
D O I
10.1002/jor.1100140204
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) instrument, a health status instrument with 100 self-reported health items, was designed for use with the broad range of patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the extremities commonly seen in clinical practice. In this paper, we report on its criterion and construct validity. Criterion validity was tested against physicians' ratings of patient functioning (e.g., upper functioning, lower functioning, daily activities, recreational functioning, emotional adjustment, and overall functioning) and standard clinical measures (e.g., grip strength, walking speed, fine motor skills, knee and elbow strength, and range of motion). Significant correlations (p less than or equal to 0.05) between its scores, physicians' ratings, and clinical measures support the MFA's criterion validity. Construct validity was demonstrated against existing measures of health status (e.g., measures of lower and upper mobility, activity level and satisfaction, health status, social support, pain. emotional status. and quality of life), in accordance with clinical hypotheses about the effect of musculoskeletal disorders on functioning (e.g., type and number of problems, severity of illness or injury, and comorbidities) and by an analysis of demographic characteristics (e.g., sex, education, income, health insurance, and employment) against the MFA scores. Discriminant construct validity was supported in an analysis of MFA scores by patient disease groups (p less than or equal to 0.01).
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 192
页数:11
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   WHICH TRADITIONAL MEASURES SHOULD BE USED IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
ANDERSON, JJ ;
FELSON, DT ;
MEENAN, RF ;
WILLIAMS, HJ .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1989, 32 (09) :1093-1099
[2]   INJURY SEVERITY SCORE - METHOD FOR DESCRIBING PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE INJURIES AND EVALUATING EMERGENCY CARE [J].
BAKER, SP ;
ONEILL, B ;
HADDON, W ;
LONG, WB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1974, 14 (03) :187-196
[3]   OUTCOME MEASUREMENT IN OSTEOARTHRITIS CLINICAL-TRIALS - THE CASE FOR STANDARDIZATION [J].
BELLAMY, N ;
BUCHANAN, WW .
CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 1984, 3 (03) :293-303
[4]   DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ISOXICAM VS PIROXICAM IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP AND KNEE [J].
BELLAMY, N ;
BUCHANAN, WW ;
GRACE, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1986, 22 :S149-S155
[5]  
Bellamy N., 1988, J ORTHOP RHEUMATOL, V1, P95
[6]  
BERGNER M, 1987, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V8, P191, DOI 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.8.1.191
[7]   THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL REVISION OF A HEALTH-STATUS MEASURE [J].
BERGNER, M ;
BOBBITT, RA ;
CARTER, WB ;
GILSON, BS .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (08) :787-805
[8]  
BIJLSMA JWJ, 1991, J RHEUMATOL, V18, P650
[9]   A COMPARISON OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE MEASURES FOR RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS RESEARCH [J].
BOMBARDIER, C ;
RABOUD, J .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1991, 12 (04) :S243-S256
[10]   COMPONENTS OF HEALTH - AN ANALYSIS IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS USING QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRES AND CLINICAL AND LABORATORY VARIABLES [J].
BORSTLAP, M ;
VANDELAAR, M ;
ZANT, J ;
VANDERKORST, J .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1993, 52 (09) :650-654