A critical review of environmental management of the 'not so Great' Barrier Reef

被引:144
作者
Brodie, Jon [1 ]
Waterhouse, Jane [1 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Catchment Reef Res Grp, Australian Ctr Trop Freshwater Res, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
关键词
coral reef; marine park; management evaluation; climate change; pollution; seagrass; ECOSYSTEM-BASED MANAGEMENT; DECLINING CORAL CALCIFICATION; WATER-QUALITY; OCEAN ACIDIFICATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SUSPENDED SEDIMENTS; TERRESTRIAL RUNOFF; PESTICIDE-RESIDUES; ACANTHASTER-PLANCI; MARINE ECOSYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecss.2012.03.012
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Recent estimates put average coral cover across the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) at about 20-30%. This is estimated to be a large reduction since the 1960s. The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act was enacted in 1975 and the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) set up shortly afterwards. So the question is: why has coral cover continued to decline when the GBR is being managed with a management regime often recognised as the best managed coral reef system in the world', based on a strong science-for-management ethic. The stressors which are known to be most responsible for the loss of coral cover (and general 'reef health') are terrestrial pollution including the link to outbreaks of crown of thorns starfish, fishing impacts and climate change. These have been established through a long and intensive research effort over the last 30 years. However the management response of the GBRMPA after 1975, while based on a strong science-for-management program, did not concentrate on these issues but instead on managing access through zoning with restrictions on fishing in very limited areas and tourism management. Significant action on fishing, including trawling, did not occur until the Trawl Management Plan of 2000 and the rezoning of the GBR Marine Park in 2004. Effective action on terrestrial pollution did not occur until the Australian Government Reef Rescue initiative which commenced in 2008. Effective action on climate change has yet to begin either nationally or globally. Thus it is not surprising that coral cover on the GBR has reduced to values similar to those seen in other coral reef areas in the world such as Indonesia and the Philippines. Science has always required long periods to acquire sufficient evidence to drive management action and hence there is a considerable lime lag between the establishment of scientific evidence and the introduction of effective management. It can still be credibly claimed that the GBR is the best managed coral reef system in the world but it must be realised that this is a relative assessment against other reef systems and management regimes and not an absolute claim for effective management. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 236 条
  • [1] Access Economics Pty Ltd, 2008, EC CONTR GBRMP 2006
  • [2] Saltmarshes in a time of change
    Adam, P
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2002, 29 (01) : 39 - 61
  • [3] Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas
    Agardy, T
    Bridgewater, P
    Crosby, MP
    Day, J
    Dayton, PK
    Kenchington, R
    Laffoley, D
    McConney, P
    Murray, PA
    Parks, JE
    Peau, L
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2003, 13 (04) : 353 - 367
  • [4] Mind the gap Addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning
    Agardy, Tundi
    di Sciara, Giuseppe Notarbartolo
    Christie, Patrick
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2011, 35 (02) : 226 - 232
  • [5] [Anonymous], GREAT BARRIER REEF M
  • [6] [Anonymous], SEDIMENT NUTR EXPORT
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2008, Synthesis of evidence to support the Scientific Consensus Statement on Water Quality in the Great Barrier Reef
  • [8] [Anonymous], 0311 J COOK U AUSTR
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2005, SCIENCE
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2010, REEF RESCUE MARINE M