Introduced and Invasive Species in Novel Rangeland Ecosystems: Friends or Foes?

被引:43
作者
Belnap, Jayne [1 ]
Ludwig, John A. [2 ]
Wilcox, Bradford P. [3 ]
Betancourt, Julio L. [4 ]
Dean, W. Richard J. [5 ]
Hoffmann, Benjamin D. [6 ]
Milton, Sue J. [5 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Moab, UT 84532 USA
[2] CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, Atherton, Qld 4883, Australia
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ecosyst Sci & Management, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
[5] Univ Cape Town, Percy Fitzpatrick Inst African Ornithol, DST NRF Ctr Excellence, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
[6] CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, Winnellie, NT 0822, Australia
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Cenchrus; decision framework; Eucalyptus; Juniperus; Opuntia; Prosopis; rinderpest; West Nile virus; IMPORTED FIRE ANT; GRASS CENCHRUS-CILIARIS; SOUTH-AFRICA; BUFFEL GRASS; BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS; EXOTIC GRASSES; SONORAN DESERT; PRICKLY PEAR; NATIVE ANTS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.2111/REM-D-11-00157.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Globally, new combinations of introduced and native plant and animal species have changed rangelands into novel ecosystems. Whereas many rangeland stakeholders (people who use or have an interest in rangelands) view intentional species introductions to improve forage and control erosion as beneficial, others focus on unintended costs, such as increased fire risk, loss of rangeland biodiversity, and threats to conservation efforts, specifically in nature reserves and parks. These conflicting views challenge all rangeland stakeholders, especially those making decisions on how best to manage novel ecosystems. To formulate a conceptual framework for decision making, we examined a wide range of novel ecosystems, created by intentional and unintentional introductions of nonnative species and land-use-facilitated spread of native ones. This framework simply divides decision making into two types: 1) straightforward-certain, and 2) complex-uncertain. We argue that management decisions to retain novel ecosystems are certain when goods and services provided by the system far outweigh the costs of restoration, for example in the case of intensively managed Cenchrus pastures. Decisions to return novel ecosystems to natural systems are also certain when the value of the system is low and restoration is easy and inexpensive as in the case of biocontrol of Opuntia infestations. In contrast, decisions whether to retain or restore novel ecosystems become complex and uncertain in cases where benefits are low and costs of control are high as, for example, in the case of stopping the expansion of Prosopis and juniperus into semiarid rangelands. Decisions to retain or restore novel ecosystems are also complex and uncertain when, for example, nonnative Eucalyptus trees expand along natural streams, negatively affecting biodiversity, but also providing timber and honey. When decision making is complex and uncertain, we suggest that rangeland managers utilize cost benefit analyses and hold stakeholder workshops to resolve conflicts.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 578
页数:10
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
ANNECKE DP, 1978, J ENTOMOL SOC S AFR, V41, P161
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ECOL MANAG RESTOR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PLANT PROTECT RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NOXIOUS WEEDS AUSTR
[6]  
Archer S., 2001, Global Biogeochemical Cycles in the Climate System, P115
[7]  
Archer S.R., 2011, Conservation Benefits of Rangeland Practices: Assessment, Recommendations, and Knowledge Gaps, P105
[8]   Potential ecological distribution of alien invasive species and risk assessment:: a case study of buffel grass in arid regions of Mexico [J].
Arriaga, L ;
Castellanos, AE ;
Moreno, E ;
Alarcón, J .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (06) :1504-1514
[9]  
Bengis Roy G., 2003, P349
[10]  
BOGUSCH EDWIN R., 1952, TEXAS JOUR SCI, V4, P85