Hindsight Bias

被引:311
作者
Roese, Neal J. [1 ]
Vohs, Kathleen D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
hindsight bias; overconfidence; metacognition; knew-it-all-along" effect; counterfactual; debias; POINT-OF-VIEW; I KNEW; ACCESSIBILITY EXPERIENCES; RETROACTIVE PESSIMISM; DECISION-MAKING; METACOGNITIVE EXPERIENCES; COGNITIVE RECONSTRUCTION; COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING; OUTCOME KNOWLEDGE; PROCESS MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/1745691612454303
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Hindsight bias occurs when people feel that they "knew it all along," that is, when they believe that an event is more predictable after it becomes known than it was before it became known. Hindsight bias embodies any combination of three aspects: memory distortion, beliefs about events' objective likelihoods, or subjective beliefs about one's own prediction abilities. Hindsight bias stems from (a) cognitive inputs (people selectively recall information consistent with what they now know to be true and engage in sensemaking to impose meaning on their own knowledge), (b) metacognitive inputs (the ease with which a past outcome is understood may be misattributed to its assumed prior likelihood), and (c) motivational inputs (people have a need to see the world as orderly and predictable and to avoid being blamed for problems). Consequences of hindsight bias include myopic attention to a single causal understanding of the past (to the neglect of other reasonable explanations) as well as general overconfidence in the certainty of one's judgments. New technologies for visualizing and understanding data sets may have the unintended consequence of heightening hindsight bias, but an intervention that encourages people to consider alternative causal explanations for a given outcome can reduce hindsight bias.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 426
页数:16
相关论文
共 190 条
[1]   Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation [J].
Alter, Adam L. ;
Oppenheimer, Daniel M. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2009, 13 (03) :219-235
[2]  
American Law Institute, 2010, REST LAW 3 TORTS LIA, V1
[3]  
Anderson JC, 1997, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V16, P20
[4]   EVALUATION OF AUDITOR DECISIONS - HINDSIGHT BIAS EFFECTS AND THE EXPECTATION GAP [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
LOWE, DJ ;
RECKERS, PMJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 14 (04) :711-737
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.032
[7]   ELIMINATING THE HINDSIGHT BIAS [J].
ARKES, HR ;
FAUST, D ;
GUILMETTE, TJ ;
HART, K .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 73 (02) :305-307
[8]   COSTS AND BENEFITS OF JUDGMENT ERRORS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DEBIASING [J].
ARKES, HR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (03) :486-498
[9]   Surprise, Memory, and Retrospective Judgment Making: Testing Cognitive Reconstruction Theories of the Hindsight Bias Effect [J].
Ash, Ivan K. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2009, 35 (04) :916-933
[10]   Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? [J].
Baumeister, RF ;
Campbell, JD ;
Krueger, JI ;
Vohs, KD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, :1-44