A Proposed Staging System for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

被引:239
作者
Nathan, Hari [1 ]
Aloia, Thomas A. [2 ]
Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas [3 ]
Abdalla, Eddie K. [3 ]
Zhu, Andrew X. [4 ]
Schulick, Richard D. [1 ]
Choti, Michael A. [1 ]
Pawlik, Timothy M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Methodist Hosp, Dept Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Hematol Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
MASS-FORMING TYPE; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; LIVER-CANCER; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; SURVIVAL; THAILAND; MODELS; NUMBER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-008-0180-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC) staging system for liver cancer is based on data exclusively derived from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and thus may be inappropriate for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). We sought to empirically derive an ICC staging system from population-based data on patients with ICC. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 598 patients who underwent surgery for ICC between 1988 and 2004. The discriminative abilities of the AJCC/UICC liver cancer and two Japanese ICC staging systems were evaluated. Independent predictors of survival were identified using Cox proportional hazards models. A staging system for ICC was then derived based on these analyses. The AJCC/UICC T classification system failed to adequately stratify the T2 and T3 cohorts due to tumor size > 5 cm not being a relevant prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-1.30]. In contrast, presence of multiple lesions (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.01-2.01) or vascular invasion (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.10-2.12) predicted adverse prognosis. Based on these findings, an ICC staging system was developed that omits tumor size. This system showed no loss of prognostic discrimination compared with the AJCC/UICC system and significant superiority over the Japanese systems. We conclude that the AJCC/UICC liver cancer staging system fails to stratify ICC patients adequately and inappropriately includes tumor size. We propose a staging system specifically developed for ICC based on number of tumors, vascular invasion, lymph node status, and presence of metastatic disease.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 22
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Proposal of progression model for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Clinicopathologic differences between hilar type and peripheral type
    Aishima, Shinichi
    Kuroda, Yousuke
    Nishihara, Yunosuke
    Iguchi, Tomohiro
    Taguchi, Kenichi
    Taketomi, Akinobu
    Maehara, Yoshihiko
    Tsuneyoshi, Masazumi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 31 (07) : 1059 - 1067
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, General Rules for the Clinical and Pathological Study ofPrimary Liver Cancer, V2nd
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, International Classification of Disease for Oncology
  • [4] Casavilla FA, 1997, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V185, P429, DOI 10.1016/S1072-7515(97)00088-4
  • [5] Developing a prognostic model in the presence of missing data: an ovarian cancer case study
    Clark, TG
    Altman, DG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (01) : 28 - 37
  • [6] Collaborative Staging Task Force of the American Joint Committee on Cancer, COLL STAG MAN COD IN
  • [7] COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
  • [8] FISHER B, 1983, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V52, P1551, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19831101)52:9<1551::AID-CNCR2820520902>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-3
  • [10] Greene F., 2002, AJCC cancer staging handbook: From the AJCC cancer staging manual, V6th