Patients' and oncologists' views on the treatment and care of advanced ovarian cancer in the UK: results from the ADVOCATE study

被引:34
作者
Jenkins, V. [1 ]
Catt, S. [1 ]
Banerjee, S. [2 ]
Gourley, C. [3 ]
Montes, A. [4 ]
Solis-Trapala, I. [1 ]
Monson, K. [1 ]
Fallowfield, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Brighton & Sussex Med Sch, Sussex Hlth Outcomes Res & Educ Canc, Brighton BN1 9QG, E Sussex, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust Chelsea & SuttonDowns, London SW3 6JJ, England
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Western Gen Hosp, MRC IGMM, Edinburgh Canc Res Ctr, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Guys Hosp, London SE1 9RT, England
关键词
advanced ovarian cancer; chemotherapy treatments; supportive care; patients' views; oncologists' views; maintenance therapy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FOLLOW-UP; PREFERENCES; BEVACIZUMAB; INSTRUMENT; OUTCOMES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2013.223
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background: Most patients presenting with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) eventually relapse. Symptom palliation, maintenance of quality of life (QoL) and prolongation of life are primary therapeutic goals. Methods: Sixty-six UK oncologists completed an online survey about AOC management. Two hundred and two patients were interviewed about care, treatment experiences and expectations. Results: Prior to diagnosis, 34% (69 out of 202) of women had >= 3 symptoms associated with AOC. Twenty-one per cent (43 out of 202) thought poor symptom recognition by general practitioners (GPs) delayed diagnosis. Amelioration of side effects experienced was variable, for example, only 54% (68 out of 127) distressed by alopecia had received sufficient information about it. Clinicians were asked 'What minimum gain in progression-free survival (PFS) would make you feel it worthwhile to offer maintenance therapy?'; 48% (24 out of 50) indicated 5-6 months, but 52% (26 out of 50) believed patients would find PFS of 3-4 months acceptable. When patients were presented with hypothetical scenarios, 33% (52 out of 160) would require 1-2 months extra life, 6% (10 out of 160) 3-4 months, 31% (49 out of 160) 5-6 months, and 31% (49 out of 160) >= 7 months. However, 86% (173 out of 202) would accept treatment that improved QoL without prolongation of life. When asked what was most important, 33% (67 out of 201) said QoL, 9% (19 out of 201) length of life and 57% (115 out of 201) said both were equally important. Conclusion: Clinicians' and patients' experiences, expectations and priorities about OC management may differ.
引用
收藏
页码:2264 / 2271
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]
[Anonymous], 2012, DEP HLTH NAT CANC PA
[3]
Supporting Clinical Practice Decisions With Real-Time Patient-Reported Outcomes [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Abernethy, Amy P. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (08) :954-956
[4]
Bottomely, 2001, EORTC QLQC30 SCORING
[5]
Incorporation of Bevacizumab in the Primary Treatment of Ovarian Cancer [J].
Burger, Robert A. ;
Brady, Mark F. ;
Bookman, Michael A. ;
Fleming, Gini F. ;
Monk, Bradley J. ;
Huang, Helen ;
Mannel, Robert S. ;
Homesley, Howard D. ;
Fowler, Jeffrey ;
Greer, Benjamin E. ;
Boente, Matthew ;
Birrer, Michael J. ;
Liang, Sharon X. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (26) :2473-2483
[6]
Cancer Research UK, 2012, OV CANC STAT
[7]
Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data [J].
Coleman, M. P. ;
Forman, D. ;
Bryant, H. ;
Butler, J. ;
Rachet, B. ;
Maringe, C. ;
Nur, U. ;
Tracey, E. ;
Coory, M. ;
Hatcher, J. ;
McGahan, C. E. ;
Turner, D. ;
Marrett, L. ;
Gjerstorff, M. L. ;
Johannesen, T. B. ;
Adolfsson, J. ;
Lambe, M. ;
Lawrence, G. ;
Meechan, D. ;
Morris, E. J. ;
Middleton, R. ;
Steward, J. ;
Richards, M. A. .
LANCET, 2011, 377 (9760) :127-138
[8]
Nurse led telephone follow up in ovarian cancer: A psychosocial perspective [J].
Cox, Anna ;
Bull, Ellen ;
Cockle-Hearne, Jane ;
Knibb, Wendy ;
Potter, Claire ;
Faithfull, Sara .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2008, 12 (05) :412-417
[9]
Preferences for follow-up after treatment for lung cancer - Assessing the nurse-led option [J].
Cox, Karen ;
Wilson, Eleanor ;
Heath, Lesley ;
Collier, Jacqueline ;
Jones, Linda ;
Johnston, Ian .
CANCER NURSING, 2006, 29 (03) :176-187
[10]
Treatment preferences in recurrent ovarian cancer [J].
Donovan, KA ;
Greene, PG ;
Shuster, JL ;
Partridge, EE ;
Tucker, DC .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2002, 86 (02) :200-211