Physicians in retainer ("Concierge") practice: A national survey of physician, patient, and practice characteristics

被引:48
作者
Alexander, GC
Kurlander, J
Wynia, MK
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, MacLean Ctr Clin Med Eth, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago Hosp, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Amer Med Assoc, Inst Eth, Chicago, IL 60610 USA
[5] Univ Chicago Hosp, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
access to care; retainer; concierge; boutique; ethics;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0233.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Retainer practices represent a new model of care whereby physicians charge an up-front fee for services that may not be covered by health insurance. The characteristics of these practices are largely unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a cross-sectional mail survey of 144 retainer physicians (58% response rate) and a national random sample of 463 nonretainer physicians (50% response rate) to compare retainer and nonretainer practices. Outcomes of interest included physician demographics, size and case-mix of patient panel, services offered and, for retainer practices, characteristics of practice development. RESULTS: Retainer physicians have much smaller patient panels (mean 898 vs 2303 patients, P <.0001) than their nonretainer counterparts, and care for fewer African-American (mean 7% vs 16%, P <.002), Hispanic (4% vs 14%, P <.001), or Medicaid (5% vs 15%, P <.001) patients. Physicians in retainer practices are more likely to offer accompanied specialist visits (30% vs 1%), house calls (63% vs 26%), 24-hour direct physician access (91% vs 40%), and several other services (all P values <.05). Most retainer physicians (85%) converted from nonretainer practices but kept few of their former patients (mean 12%). Most retainer physicians (84%) provide charity care and many continue to see some patients (mean 17%) who do not pay retainer fees. CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences between retainer and nonretainer practices, there is also substantial overlap in services provided. These findings, in conjunction with the scope of patient discontinuity when physicians transition to retainer practice, suggest that ethical and legal debates about the standing of these practices will endure.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1083
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ADAMS D, 2004, AM MED NEWS 0614, P1
[2]  
ADAMS D, 2004, AM MED NEWS 0614, P2
[3]  
*AM MED ASS, 2004, 3A03 AM MED ASS
[4]   Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals [J].
Asch, DA ;
Jedrziewski, MK ;
Christakis, NA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (10) :1129-1136
[5]   Luxury primary care - Market innovation or threat to access? [J].
Brennan, TA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1165-1168
[6]  
CAREY B, 2002, LOS ANGELES TIM 0722
[7]   Luxury primary care, academic medical centers, and the erosion of science and professional ethics [J].
Donohoe, M .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (01) :90-94
[8]  
Flocke SA, 1997, J FAM PRACTICE, V45, P129
[9]  
*GAO, 2003, AM MED NEWS 0716, P10
[10]  
*GAO, 2003, AM MED NEWS 0716, P12