Effect of resynchronization therapy stimulation site on the systolic function of heart failure patients

被引:476
作者
Butter, C
Auricchio, A
Stellbrink, C
Fleck, E
Ding, J
Yu, YH
Huvelle, E
Spinelli, J
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Internal Med Cardiol, Charite, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] German Heart Ctr, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp, Div Cardiol, Magdeburg, Germany
[4] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Cardiol, Aachen, Germany
关键词
heart failure; bundle-branch block; pacing; contractility; electrical stimulation;
D O I
10.1161/hc5001.102229
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves systolic function in heart failure patients with ventricular conduction delay by stimulating the left ventricle (LV) or both ventricles (biventricular, BV). Optimal LV,site selection is of major clinical interest for CRT device implantation however, the dependence of hemodynamics on LV stimulation site has not been established, Thus. the objective of this study was to compare the hemodynamic response to CRT for 2 LV coronary vein sites: the free wall and anterior wall. Methods and Results-A total of 30 patients (mean NYHA class, 2.7 mean QRS interval, 152 ms; mean PR interval, 194 ms) enrolled in the PATH-CHF-II trial were studied. CRT was administered with LV and BV stimulation in VDD mode at 4 AV delays. LV stimulation was at the lateral free wall or anterior wall, whereas right ventricular stimulation was fixed near the apex. LV+dP/dt(max), and aortic pulse pressure changes from baseline during CRT were compared for LV sites. Free wall sites with LV and BV stimulation yielded significantly larger LV+dP/dt(max), (14% versus 6%, P <0.001 for LV 12% versus 5%, P <0.001 for BV) and pulse pressure (8% versus 4%, P <0.001 for LV; 9% versus 5%, P <0.001 for BV) compared with anterior sites. In one third of patients, CRT at free wall sites increased LV+dP/dt(max), whereas it decreased at anterior sites over most AV delays. Conclusion-CRT with LV free wall stimulation produced significantly better LV systolic performance compared with anterior stimulation. Further studies are warranted to prove the clinical superiority of the LV free wall as a site for long-term CRT.
引用
收藏
页码:3026 / 3029
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure
    Auricchio, A
    Stellbrink, C
    Block, M
    Sack, S
    Vogt, J
    Bakker, P
    Klein, H
    Kramer, A
    Ding, J
    Salo, R
    Tockman, B
    Pochet, T
    Spinelli, J
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1999, 99 (23) : 2993 - 3001
  • [2] Auricchio A, 1999, AM J CARDIOL, V83, p136D
  • [3] Bakker PF, 2000, J INTERV CARD ELECTR, V4, P395
  • [4] Multisite stimulation for correction of cardiac asynchrony
    Cazeau, S
    Gras, D
    Lazarus, A
    Ritter, P
    Mugica, J
    [J]. HEART, 2000, 84 (06) : 579 - 581
  • [5] Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay.
    Cazeau, S
    Leclercq, C
    Lavergne, T
    Walker, S
    Varma, C
    Linde, C
    Garrigue, S
    Kappenberger, L
    Haywood, GA
    Santini, M
    Bailleul, C
    Daubert, JC
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (12) : 873 - 880
  • [6] Improved left ventricular mechanics from acute VDD pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction delay
    Kass, DA
    Chen, CH
    Curry, C
    Talbot, M
    Berger, R
    Fetics, B
    Nevo, E
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1999, 99 (12) : 1567 - 1573
  • [7] Nelson GS, 2000, CIRCULATION, V102, P3053
  • [8] Pappone C, 2000, Ital Heart J, V1, P464
  • [9] Reuter S, 2000, PACE, V23, P1713