Comparison of disruption procedures for enumeration of activated sludge floc bacteria by flow cytometry

被引:43
作者
Falcioni, T [1 ]
Manti, A
Boi, P
Canonico, B
Balsamo, M
Papal, S
机构
[1] Univ Carlo Bo, Ctr Cytometry & Cytomorphol, Urbino, Italy
[2] Univ Carlo Bo, Inst Morphol Sci, Urbino, Italy
关键词
activated sludge; flow cytometry; total bacterial count; homogenization; sonication;
D O I
10.1002/cyto.b.20097
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: In a wastewater treatment plant, the degradation process is performed by a variable and mixed community of microorganisms in an aerobic aquatic environment. The activated-sludge process is based on the formation of strong microbial flocs where many bacteria are attached to sludge flocs. Methods: Cytometric analysis requires an homogeneous cell suspension and so detachment of bacteria from flocs is required. In this study, sonication and homogenization were compared to find the most adequate pretreatment method for bacterial cytometric analysis in activated sludge samples. Bacterial viability was tested with a nucleic acid double-staining (NABS) protocol (Barbesti et al, Cytometry 2000;40:214-218) and on flow cytometry. Results: Each method showed a good efficiency in terms of bacterial detachment; thus finally, the choice of which could be the best treatment method was based on both viability results and analysis rapidity. On the basis of the degree of cell detachment and viability, the maximum value was obtained by sonication (2 x 45 ''). Conclusions: The use of flow cytometry in conjunction with fluorescent dyes and an adequate pretreatment represents a useful method to rapidly detect and enumerate bacteria in activated sludge samples. (c) 2006 International Society for Analytical Cytology.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 153
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Amann R, 1998, FEMS MICROBIOL ECOL, V25, P205, DOI 10.1016/S0168-6496(98)00006-3
[2]  
Barbesti S, 2000, CYTOMETRY, V40, P214, DOI 10.1002/1097-0320(20000701)40:3<214::AID-CYTO6>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-M
[4]   AEROBIC HETEROTROPHIC BACTERIA IN ACTIVTED SLUDGE [J].
BENEDICT, RG ;
CARLSON, DA .
WATER RESEARCH, 1971, 5 (11) :1023-&
[5]  
Brando B, 2000, CYTOMETRY, V42, P327, DOI 10.1002/1097-0320(20001215)42:6<327::AID-CYTO1000>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-F
[7]   Comparison of detachment procedures for direct counts of bacteria associated with sediment particles, plant litter and epiphytic biofilms [J].
Buesing, N ;
Gessner, MO .
AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 2002, 27 (01) :29-36
[8]   Flow cytometric determination of bacterial abundance in lake plankton with the green nucleic acid stain SYTO 13 [J].
delGiorgio, P ;
Bird, DF ;
Prairie, YT ;
Planas, D .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1996, 41 (04) :783-789
[9]   ENUMERATION OF SANDY SEDIMENT BACTERIA - SEARCH FOR OPTIMAL PROTOCOL [J].
EPSTEIN, SS ;
ROSSEL, J .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1995, 117 (1-3) :289-298
[10]   Simultaneous fluorescent gram staining and activity assessment of activated sludge bacteria [J].
Forster, S ;
Snape, JR ;
Lappin-Scott, HM ;
Porter, J .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 68 (10) :4772-4779