The effect of nonphysical traits on the perception of physical attractiveness - Three naturalistic studies

被引:72
作者
Kniffin, KM [1 ]
Wilson, DS
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Anthropol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Anthropol, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
[3] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Biol Sci, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
关键词
physical attractiveness; beauty; aesthetics; evolutionary psychology; task-oriented groups;
D O I
10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00006-6
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
From an evolutionary perspective, beauty is regarded as an assessment of fitness value. The fitness value of a social partner can be influenced by both physical and nonphysical traits. It follows that the perceived beauty of a social partner can be influenced by nonphysical traits such as liking, respect, familiarity, and contribution to shared goals in addition to physical traits such as youth, waist-to-hip ratio, and bilateral symmetry. We present three studies involving the evaluation of known social partners showing that judgments of physical attractiveness are strongly influenced by nonphysical factors. Females are more strongly influenced by nonphysical factors than males and there are large individual differences within each sex. In general, research on physical attractiveness based on the evaluation of purely physical traits of strangers might miss some of the most important factors influencing the perception of physical attractiveness among known associates. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 101
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Risk perceptions and safer-sex intentions: Does a partner's physical attractiveness undermine the use of risk-relevant information? [J].
Agocha, VB ;
Cooper, ML .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1999, 25 (06) :746-759
[2]   Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior [J].
Ambady, N ;
Hallahan, M ;
Conner, B .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 77 (03) :538-547
[3]   HALF A MINUTE - PREDICTING TEACHER EVALUATIONS FROM THIN SLICES OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR AND PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS [J].
AMBADY, N ;
ROSENTHAL, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 64 (03) :431-441
[4]  
Buss D.M., 1999, EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOL
[5]   WHAT IS BEAUTIFUL IS GOOD [J].
DION, K ;
WALSTER, E ;
BERSCHEID, E .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 24 (03) :285-+
[6]   FATHER ABSENCE AND REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY - AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE [J].
DRAPER, P ;
HARPENDING, H .
JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1982, 38 (03) :255-273
[7]   Quality of early family relationships and individual differences in the timing of pubertal maturation in girls: A longitudinal test of an evolutionary model [J].
Ellis, BJ ;
McFadyen-Ketchum, S ;
Dodge, KA ;
Pettit, GS ;
Bates, JE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 77 (02) :387-401
[8]   GOOD-LOOKING PEOPLE ARE NOT WHAT WE THINK [J].
FEINGOLD, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 111 (02) :304-341
[9]   ARE THE GOOD BEAUTIFUL OR THE BEAUTIFUL GOOD - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHILDRENS PERCEPTIONS OF ABILITY AND PERCEPTIONS OF PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS [J].
FELSON, RB ;
BOHRNSTEDT, GW .
US SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 42 (04) :386-392
[10]   The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism [J].
Gangestad, SW ;
Simpson, JA .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2000, 23 (04) :573-+