Analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous paracetamol (acetaminophen) administered as a 2 g starting dose following third molar surgery

被引:58
作者
Juhl, GI
Norholt, SE
Tonnesen, E
Hiesse-Provost, O
Jensen, TS
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Danish Pain Res Ctr, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[4] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Dept Med, F-92500 Rueil Malmaison, France
关键词
intravenous; paracetamol; postoperative pain; third molar surgery; starting dose;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.004
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The recommended dose for intravenous (IV) paracetamol injection in adults is I g, however pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic findings suggest that a better analgesia could be obtained with a 2 g starting dose. Methods: A single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-parallel group study was performed to demonstrate the analgesic efficacy and safety of IV paracetamol 2 g. Following third molar surgery, patients reporting moderate to severe pain received a single 15-min infusion of either IV paracetamol 2 g, IV paracetamol I g or placebo. Efficacy and safety were evaluated over 8 h. Laboratory tests were performed before and 48 h after drug administration. Results: Two hundred and ninety seven patients (132 = IV paracetamol 2 g; 132 = IV paracetamol I g; 33 = placebo) were randomised and completed the study. The summed pain relief over 6 It (TOTPAR6) was significantly superior with IV paracetamol 2 g as compared to IV paracetamol I g and placebo (p < 0.0001). Pain relief scores of IV paracetamol 2 g were significantly superior to IV paracetamol I g and to placebo from T30' to T8h (p < 0.0001). Median duration of analgesia was significantly longer following IV paracetamol 2 g compared to IV paracetamol I g and placebo (p < 0.0001). Adverse events occurred with the same frequency in the 3 treatment groups. No clinically significant changes from baseline were observed for vital signs or laboratory tests. Conclusion: The analgesic efficacy of a 2 g starting dose of IV paracetamol was superior over the recommended dose of I g in terms of magnitude and duration of analgesic effect for postoperative pain following third molar surgery, with no significant difference between groups regarding safety. (c) 2005 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 377
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ADV PAIN RES THER
[2]   Effectiveness of an acute pain service inception in a general hospital [J].
Bardiau, FM ;
Braeckman, MM ;
Seidel, L ;
Albert, A ;
Boogaerts, JG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1999, 11 (07) :583-589
[3]  
*EMEA CPMP, 2002, CPMPEWP61200 EMEA
[4]   Postoperative analgesia with iv propacetamol and ketoprofen combination after disc surgery [J].
Fletcher, D ;
Negre, I ;
Barbin, C ;
Francois, A ;
Carreres, C ;
Falgueirettes, C ;
Barboteu, A ;
Samii, K .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1997, 44 (05) :479-485
[5]  
FORBES J, 1991, ADV PAIN RES THERAPY, P347
[6]   Analgesic effect of i.v. paracetamol: possible ceiling effect of paracetamol in postoperative pain [J].
Hahn, TW ;
Mogensen, T ;
Lund, C ;
Jacobsen, LS ;
Hjortsoe, NC ;
Rasmussen, SN ;
Rasmussen, M .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 47 (02) :138-145
[7]   Intravenous administration of propacetamol reduces morphine consumption after spinal fusion surgery [J].
Hernández-Palazón, J ;
Tortosa, JA ;
Martínez-Lage, JF ;
Pérez-Flores, D .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (06) :1473-1476
[8]   Paracetamol concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid [J].
Jensen, L. L. ;
Handberg, G. ;
Brosen, K. ;
Schmedes, A. ;
Ording, H. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 :193-193
[9]   Intravenous acetaminophen (paracetamol): Comparable analgesic efficacy, but better local safety than its prodrug, propacetamol, for postoperative pain after third molar surgery [J].
Moller, PL ;
Juhl, GI ;
Payen-Champenois, C ;
Skoglund, LA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (01) :90-96
[10]   Assessment of postoperative pain after laryngeal surgery for cancer [J].
Mom, T ;
Bazin, JE ;
Commun, F ;
Dubray, C ;
Eschalier, A ;
Derbal, C ;
Avan, P ;
Gilain, L .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1998, 124 (07) :794-798