Aspects of decision support in water management -: example Berlin and Potsdam (Germany) I -: spatially differentiated evaluation

被引:65
作者
Simon, U
Brüggemann, R
Pudenz, S
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Freshwater Ecol & Inland Fisheries, D-12587 Berlin, Germany
[2] Criter Evaluat & Informat Management, D-10999 Berlin, Germany
关键词
decision support systems; PROMETHEE; Hasse diagram technique; spatially differentiated evaluation; water management strategies; water pollution;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.037
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Decisions about sustainable development demand spatially differentiated evaluations. As an example, we demonstrate the evaluation of water management strategies in the cities of Berlin and Potsdam (Germany) with respect to their ecological effects in 14 sections of the surface water system. Two decision support systems were compared, namely PROMETHEE, which is designed to obtain a clear decision (linear ranking), and Hasse Diagram Technique (HDT), normally providing more than one favourable solution (partial order). By PROMETHEE, the spatial differentiation had unwanted effects on the result, negating the stakeholders determined weighting of indicators. Therefore, the stakeholder can barely benefit from the convenience of obtaining a clear decision (linear ranking). In contrast, the result obtained by HDT was not influenced by spatial differentiation. Furthermore, HDT provided helpful tools to analyse the evaluation result, such as the concept of antagonistic indicators to discover conflicts in the evaluation process. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1809 / 1816
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] BEHRENDT H, 2000, NUTR EMISSIONS RIVER, P1
  • [2] Behrendt H, 1997, ARCH NAT CONSERV LAN, V35, P329
  • [3] BEHRENDT H, 1999, ZUKUNFT WASSER DOKUM, P33
  • [4] A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD - (THE PROMETHEE METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING)
    BRANS, JP
    VINCKE, PH
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (06) : 647 - 656
  • [5] A GRAPH-THEORETICAL TOOL FOR PRIORITY SETTING OF CHEMICALS
    BRUGGEMANN, R
    MUNZER, B
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 1993, 27 (09) : 1729 - 1736
  • [6] Brüggemann R, 1999, ACTA HYDROCH HYDROB, V27, P170
  • [7] Applying the concept of partially ordered sets on the ranking of near-shore sediments by a battery of tests
    Brüggemann, R
    Halfon, E
    Welzl, G
    Voigt, K
    Steinberg, CEW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2001, 41 (04): : 918 - 925
  • [8] BRUGGEMANN R, 2095 GSF, P2
  • [9] BRUGGEMANN R, 2003, INTRO MODEL SUPPORTE, P1
  • [10] COSTA CABE, 1990, READINGS MULTIPLE CR, P1