Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that the great difference in diploid number between human and African green monkey is mostly due to non-Robertsonian fissions

被引:51
作者
Finelli, P
Stanyon, R
Plesker, R
Ferguson-Smith, MA
O'Brien, PCM
Wienberg, J
机构
[1] NCI, Lab Genom Divers, Frederick Canc Res & Dev Ctr, NIH, Frederick, MD 21702 USA
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Pathol, Cambridge CB2 1QP, England
[3] Paul Ehrlich Inst, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s003359901077
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We used reciprocal chromosome painting with both African green monkey (C. aethiops) and human chromosome specific DNA probes to delineate homologous regions in the two species. Probes were derived by fluorescence-activated chromosome flow sorting and then were reciprocally hybridized to metaphase spreads of each species. Segments in the size range of a single chromosome band were identified, demonstrating the sensitivity of the approach when comparing species that diverged more than 20 million years ago. Outgroup analysis shows that the great difference in diploid numbers between the African green monkey (2n = 60) and humans (2n = 46) is mainly owing to fissions, and the direction of change is towards increasing diploid numbers. However, most break points apparently lie outside of the centromere regions, suggesting that the changes were not solely Robertsonian as has been previously assumed. No reciprocal translocations have occurred in the phylogenetic lines leading to humans or African green monkeys. The primate paints established here are a valuable tool to establish interspecies homology, to define rearrangements, and to determine the mechanisms of chromosomal evolution in primate species.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 718
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Identification of complex chromosome rearrangements in the gibbon by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) of a human chromosome 2q specific microlibrary, yeast artificial chromosomes, and reciprocal chromosome painting [J].
Arnold, N ;
Stanyon, R ;
Jauch, A ;
OBrien, P ;
Wienberg, J .
CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1996, 74 (1-2) :80-85
[2]  
Bigoni F, 1997, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V102, P315, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199703)102:3<315::AID-AJPA2>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-U
[4]  
Bigoni F, 1997, AM J PRIMATOL, V42, P289, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1997)42:4<289::AID-AJP4>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-T
[6]  
CLEMENTE IC, 1990, HUM GENET, V84, P493
[7]   DETECTION OF CHROMOSOME-ABERRATIONS IN METAPHASE AND INTERPHASE TUMOR-CELLS BY INSITU HYBRIDIZATION USING CHROMOSOME-SPECIFIC LIBRARY PROBES [J].
CREMER, T ;
LICHTER, P ;
BORDEN, J ;
WARD, DC ;
MANUELIDIS, L .
HUMAN GENETICS, 1988, 80 (03) :235-246
[8]  
de Grouchy J., 1977, Chromosomes Today, V6, P183
[9]   CHROMOSOMAL EVOLUTION IN PRIMATES - TENTATIVE PHYLOGENY FROM MICROCEBUS-MURINUS (PROSIMIAN) TO MAN [J].
DUTRILLAUX, B .
HUMAN GENETICS, 1979, 48 (03) :251-314
[10]   IDENTITY OF EUCHROMATIC BANDS FROM MAN TO CERCOPITHECIDAE - CERCOPITHECUS-AETHIOPS, CERCOPITHECUS-SABAEUS, ERYTHROCEBUS-PATAS, AND MIOPITHECUS-TALAPOIN [J].
DUTRILLAUX, B ;
VIEGASPEQUIGNOT, E ;
COUTURIER, J ;
CHAUVIER, G .
HUMAN GENETICS, 1978, 45 (03) :283-296