The REACH concept and its impact on toxicological sciences

被引:68
作者
Hengstler, JG
Foth, H
Kahl, R
Kramer, PJ
Lilienblum, W
Schulz, T
Schweinfurth, H
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Ctr Toxicol, Inst Legal Med, D-04107 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Rudolf Boehm Inst Pharmacol & Toxicol, D-04107 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Environm Toxicol, D-06097 Halle, Germany
[4] Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Toxicol, D-40001 Dusseldorf, Germany
[5] Merck KGaA, Inst Toxicol, D-64271 Darmstadt, Germany
[6] Thomas Schulz BfR, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[7] Schering AG, Expt Toxicol, D-13342 Berlin, Germany
关键词
risk assessment; quantitative structure-activity relationships; QSAR; alternative methods; in vitro techniques; genomics; proteomics; metabonomics; integrated testing strategies;
D O I
10.1016/j.tox.2005.12.2005
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Currently, comprehensive toxicological data are available only for a small percentage of the 30,000 substances produced in volumes of 1-100 tons per year in the EU. Substances with inadequate safety data sets may pose a risk to employees, consumers and the environment. To improve this unsatisfactory situation the European Commission put forward a draft concept that will probably become law in 2006. The acronym of this concept is REACH standing for Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals. The aim of REACH is to systematically evaluate the risk of approximately 30,000 chemical substances produced, used or imported in quantities of 1-100 tons per year. From a practical point of view the testing requirements for these chemicals are one of the most important parts of the REACH proposal. The latter progressively increase with the volume of chemical substances, including, e.g. acute, subchronic and chronic toxicity tests. Without doubt REACH will provide an important contribution to health protection for workers and consumers. But perhaps even more importantly, REACH offers an opportunity to optimize and innovate testing strategies for chemicals. Such novel techniques are in particular RNA expression profiling, proteome analysis and metabonomics to describe alterations in gene or protein expressions patterns or in metabolite concentrations in response to toxic stimuli. Promising data have been published indicating that these techniques might identify hepato- or nephrotoxic compounds or even carcinogens differentiating between genotoxic and non-genotoxic substances. However, so far only a relatively small number of selected typical substances with well known toxic mechanisms has been tested. Therefore, the most promising innovative techniques should be optimized and validated by investigating a series of other typical but also untypical substances. In a further step a supplementary research program to REACH should be launched including promising innovative techniques (e.g. genomics, proteomics, metabonomics) but also other alternative methods (e.g. in vitro or QSAR), concentrating on the same substances that have to be tested by conventional animal studies in the mandatory part of REACH. In the present review we summarize key features of REACH, and discuss possibilities for the development of improved techniques and integrated strategies for toxicity testing.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 239
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   More than a cosmetic change [J].
Abbott, A .
NATURE, 2005, 438 (7065) :144-146
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
*BFR, 2004, NEW EC CHEM LEG AN W
[4]   Gene expression in two hepatic cell lines, cultured primary hepatocytes, and liver slices compared to the in vivo liver gene expression in rats:: Possible implications for toxicogenomics use of in vitro systems [J].
Boess, F ;
Kamber, M ;
Romer, S ;
Gasser, R ;
Muller, D ;
Albertini, S ;
Suter, L .
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 73 (02) :386-402
[5]   Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals - new aspects to be considered in a European perspective [J].
Bolt, HM ;
Foth, H ;
Hengstler, JG ;
Degen, GH .
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 151 (01) :29-41
[6]   Metabolic pathways of 4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine (2C-B): analysis of phase I metabolism with hepatocytes of six species including human [J].
Carmo, H ;
Hengstler, JG ;
de Boer, D ;
Ringel, M ;
Remiao, F ;
Carvalho, F ;
Fernandes, E ;
dos Reys, LA ;
Oesch, F ;
Bastos, MD .
TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 206 (01) :75-89
[7]   Use of a low-density microarray for studying gene expression patterns induced by hepatotoxicants on primary cultures of rat hepatocytes [J].
de Longueville, F ;
Atienzar, FA ;
Marcq, L ;
Dufrane, S ;
Evrard, S ;
Wouters, L ;
Leroux, F ;
Bertholet, V ;
Gerin, B ;
Whomsley, R ;
Arnould, T ;
Remacle, J ;
Canning, M .
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 75 (02) :378-392
[8]   Comparison of the expression profiles induced by genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens in rat liver [J].
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer, H ;
Stuart, B ;
Wahle, B ;
Bomann, W ;
Ahr, HJ .
MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 2005, 575 (1-2) :61-84
[9]  
*EU, 2002, OFF J EUR COMMUN C, V54, P13
[10]   Use of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in predictive toxicology:: Identification of potential early protein biomarkers in chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis [J].
Fella, K ;
Glückmann, M ;
Hellmann, J ;
Karas, M ;
Kramer, PJ ;
Kröger, M .
PROTEOMICS, 2005, 5 (07) :1914-1927