An investigation of cut points for primary breast cancer oestrogen and progesterone receptor assays

被引:13
作者
Chapman, JW
Mobbs, BG
McCready, DR
Lickley, HLA
Trudeau, ME
Hanna, W
Kahn, HJ
Sawka, CA
Fish, EB
Pritchard, KI
机构
[1] ONTARIO CANC TREATMENT & RES FDN, TORONTO SUNNYBROOK REG CANC CTR, TORONTO, ON M4N 3M5, CANADA
[2] UNIV TORONTO, TORONTO, ON, CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0960-0760(95)00275-8
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Oestrogen and progesterone receptor (ER and PgR) assay values are frequently used in medical decision-making for breast cancer patients. We have proposed statistical standardization of receptor assay values to improve inter-laboratory comparability, and now report the use of standardized log units (SLU) to investigate the effects of ER and PgR cut-points on time to first recurrence outside the breast (DFS). Between 1980 and 1986, there were 678 primary breast cancer patients treated at the Henrietta Banting Breast Centre (HBBC). The effects of ER and PgR cut-points were examined with multivariate analyses considering the variables: age, tumour size, nodal status, weight and adjuvant treatment. We considered receptor assay cut-points ranging from -1.0 to +1.0 SLU (ER between 7 and 166 fmol/mg protein; PgR between 7 and 18l fmol/mg protein). PgR was included in the multivariate prognostic models more often than ER, although patients had a better prognosis with both larger ER and PgR values. There was no best cent-point for ER or PgR, and there was strong evidence that ER and PgR should be considered as continuous rather than dichotomous (negative, positive) variables. Patient prognosis should also be more comparable with SLU. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 328
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ALLEGRA JC, 1979, CANCER TREAT REP, V63, P1271
[2]   DANGERS OF USING OPTIMAL CUTPOINTS IN THE EVALUATION OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
LAUSEN, B ;
SAUERBREI, W ;
SCHUMACHER, M .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1994, 86 (11) :829-835
[3]  
BLAMEY RW, 1980, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V46, P2765, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19801215)46:12+<2765::AID-CNCR2820461404>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-C
[5]  
Chapman J. W., 1994, Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting, V35, P228
[6]   A COMPARISON OF ALL-SUBSET COX AND ACCELERATED FAILURE TIME MODELS WITH COX STEP-WISE REGRESSION FOR NODE-POSITIVE BREAST-CANCER [J].
CHAPMAN, JAW ;
TRUDEAU, ME ;
PRITCHARD, KI ;
SAWKA, CA ;
MOBBS, BG ;
HANNA, WM ;
KAHN, H ;
MCCREADY, DR ;
LICKLEY, LA .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1992, 22 (03) :263-272
[7]   THE STANDARDIZATION OF ESTROGEN-RECEPTORS [J].
CHAPMAN, JAW ;
MOBBS, BG ;
HANNA, WM ;
SAWKA, CA ;
PRITCHARD, KI ;
LICKLEY, HL ;
TRUDEAU, ME ;
RYAN, ED ;
OOI, TC ;
SUTHERLAND, DJA ;
TUSTANOFF, ER ;
MCCREADY, DR .
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1993, 45 (05) :367-373
[8]  
CHAPMAN JW, 1995, P AM ASS CANC RES, V36
[9]   PROGESTERONE RECEPTORS AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN STAGE-II BREAST-CANCER [J].
CLARK, GM ;
MCGUIRE, WL ;
HUBAY, CA ;
PEARSON, OH ;
MARSHALL, JS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 309 (22) :1343-1347
[10]  
COHEN JL, 1981, ESTROGEN RECEPTOR AS, P43