A randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage after lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies

Objective: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of retroperitoneal drainage Methods: One hundred thirty-seven consecutive patients undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies were randomized to receive (Group A, 68) or not (Group B, 69) retroperitoneal drainage. The pelvic peritoneum and the paracolic gutters were not sutured after node dissection. Perioperative data and complications were recorded. Results: Clinical and surgical parameters were comparable in the two groups. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group B (P < 0.001), whereas the complication rate was significantly higher in Group A (P = 0.01). This was mainly due to a significant increase in lymphocyst and lymphocyst-related morbidity. Sonographic monitoring for lymphocyst showed free abdominal fluid in 18% of drained and 36% of not-drained patients (P = 0.03). Symptomatic ascites developed in 2 drained (3%) and 3 not-drained (4%) patients (NS), respectively. Conclusions: Prophylactic drainage of the retroperitoneum seems to increase lymphadenectomy-related morbidity and postoperative stay. Therefore, routine drainage following lymphadenectomy seems to be no longer indicated when the retroperitoneum is left open. (C) 1997 Academic Press.