Use of a goal setting intervention to increase adherence to low back pain rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial

被引:49
作者
Coppack, Russell J. [1 ]
Kristensen, Jakob [1 ]
Karageorghis, Costas I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Def Med Rehabil Ctr, Ctr Human Performance Rehabil & Sports Med, Epsom KT18 6JW, Surrey, England
[2] Brunel Univ, Sch Sport & Educ, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
关键词
Exercise therapy; performance profiling; self-efficacy; treatment efficacy; SPORT-INJURY REHABILITATION; EXERCISE ADHERENCE; SELF-EFFICACY; MOTIVATION; PROGRAM; PREDICTORS; DISABILITY; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1177/0269215512436613
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100232 [康复医学];
摘要
Objective: To examine the effects of a goal setting intervention on self-efficacy, treatment efficacy, adherence and treatment outcome in patients undergoing low back pain rehabilitation. Design: A mixed-model 2 (time) x 3 (group) randomized controlled trial. Setting: A residential rehabilitation centre for military personnel. Subjects: UK military personnel volunteers (N = 48); mean age was 32.9 (SD 7.9) with a diagnosis of non-specific low back pain. Interventions: Subjects were randomly assigned to either a goal setting experimental group (Exp, n = 16), therapist-led exercise therapy group (C1, n = 16) or non-therapist-led exercise therapy group (C2, n = 16). Treatment duration for all groups was three weeks. Main measures: Self-efficacy, treatment efficacy and treatment outcome were recorded before and after the treatment period. Adherence was rated during regularly scheduled treatment sessions using the Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale (SIRAS). The Biering-Sorensen test was used as the primary measure of treatment outcome. Results: ANCOVA results showed that adherence scores were significantly higher in the experimental group (13.70 +/- 1.58) compared with C2 (11.74 +/- 1.35), (P < 0.025). There was no significant difference for adherence between the experimental group and C1 (P = 0.13). Self-efficacy was significantly higher in the experimental group compared to both C1 and C2 (P < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was found for treatment efficacy. Treatment outcome did not differ significantly between the experimental and two control groups. Conclusions: The findings provide partial support for the use of goal setting to enhance adherence in clinical rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:1032 / 1042
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]
Goal-setting protocol in adherence to exercise by Italian adults [J].
Annesi, JJ .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2002, 94 (02) :453-458
[2]
[Anonymous], 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P1448
[3]
[Anonymous], 2000, UNDERSTANDING CHANGI
[4]
SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[5]
Bassett S.F., 1999, PHYSIOTHERAPY, V85, P130, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)65693-3, 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)65693-3]
[6]
PHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS AS RISK INDICATORS FOR LOW-BACK TROUBLE OVER A ONE-YEAR PERIOD [J].
BIERINGSORENSEN, F .
SPINE, 1984, 9 (02) :106-119
[7]
Brewer B., 2000, Physical Therapy in Sport, V1, P68, DOI [10.1054/ptsp.2000.0019, DOI 10.1054/PTSP.2000.0019]
[8]
Adherence to sport injury rehabilitation programs [J].
Brewer, BW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 10 (01) :70-82
[9]
Protection motivation theory and adherence to sport injury rehabilitation revisited [J].
Brewer, BW ;
Cornelius, AE ;
Van Raalte, JL ;
Petitpas, AJ ;
Sklar, JH ;
Pohlman, MH ;
Krushell, RJ ;
Ditmar, TD .
SPORT PSYCHOLOGIST, 2003, 17 (01) :95-103
[10]
Construct validity and interrater agreement of the sport injury rehabilitation adherence scale [J].
Brewer, BW ;
Avondoglio, JB ;
Cornelius, AE ;
Van Raalte, JL ;
Brickner, JC ;
Petitpas, AJ ;
Kolt, GS ;
Pizzari, T ;
Schoo, AMM ;
Emery, K ;
Hatten, SJ .
JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2002, 11 (03) :170-178