A neutral model of transcriptome evolution

被引:270
作者
Khaitovich, P
Weiss, G
Lachmann, M
Hellmann, I
Enard, W
Muetzel, B
Wirkner, U
Ansorge, W
Pääbo, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Evolut Anthropol, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, WE Informat Bioinformat, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] European Mol Biol Lab, Heidelberg, Germany
来源
PLOS BIOLOGY | 2004年 / 2卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pbio.0020132
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Microarray technologies allow the identification of large numbers of expression differences within and between species. Although environmental and physiological stimuli are clearly responsible for changes in the expression levels of many genes, it is not known whether the majority of changes of gene expression fixed during evolution between species and between various tissues within a species are caused by Darwinian selection or by stochastic processes. We find the following: (1) expression differences between species accumulate approximately linearly with time; (2) gene expression variation among individuals within a species correlates positively with expression divergence between species; (3) rates of expression divergence between species do not differ significantly between intact genes and expressed pseudogenes; (4) expression differences between brain regions within a species have accumulated approximately linearly with time since these regions emerged during evolution. These results suggest that the majority of expression differences observed between species are selectively neutral or nearly neutral and likely to be of little or no functional significance. Therefore, the identification of gene expression differences between species fixed by selection should be based on null hypotheses assuming functional neutrality. Furthermore, it may be possible to apply a molecular clock based on expression differences to infer the evolutionary history of tissues.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 689
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias [J].
Bolstad, BM ;
Irizarry, RA ;
Åstrand, M ;
Speed, TP .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (02) :185-193
[2]  
Butler A.B., 1996, COMP VERTEBRATE NEUR
[3]   Elevated gene expression levels distinguish human from non-human primate brains [J].
Cáceres, M ;
Lachuer, J ;
Zapala, MA ;
Redmond, JC ;
Kudo, L ;
Geschwind, DH ;
Lockhart, DJ ;
Preuss, TM ;
Barlow, C .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (22) :13030-13035
[4]   SOME QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR STUDYING EVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS IN SINGLE CHARACTERS [J].
CHARLESWORTH, B .
PALEOBIOLOGY, 1984, 10 (03) :308-318
[5]   Genomic divergences between humans and other hominoids and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees [J].
Chen, FC ;
Li, WH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2001, 68 (02) :444-456
[6]  
CORTESCANTELI M, 2004, IN PRESS J BIOL CHEM
[7]   Intra- and interspecific variation in primate gene expression patterns [J].
Enard, W ;
Khaitovich, P ;
Klose, J ;
Zöllner, S ;
Heissig, F ;
Giavalisco, P ;
Nieselt-Struwe, K ;
Muchmore, E ;
Varki, A ;
Ravid, R ;
Doxiadis, GM ;
Bontrop, RE ;
Pääbo, S .
SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5566) :340-343
[8]  
Felsenstein Joseph, 2004, Inferring_phylogenies, V2
[9]   Estimation of divergence times for major lineages of primate species [J].
Glazko, GV ;
Nei, M .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2003, 20 (03) :424-434
[10]   SPANDRELS OF SAN-MARCO AND THE PANGLOSSIAN PARADIGM - A CRITIQUE OF THE ADAPTATIONIST PROGRAM [J].
GOULD, SJ ;
LEWONTIN, RC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1979, 205 (1161) :581-598