Management of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: guide to therapy

被引:96
作者
Bielory, Brett P. [1 ]
O'Brien, Terrence P. [1 ]
Bielory, Leonard [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Bascom Palmer Eye Inst, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
关键词
allergic rhinitis; C-20 ester corticosteroid; C-20 ketone corticosteroid; loteprednol etabonate; seasonal allergic conjunctivitis; GIANT PAPILLARY CONJUNCTIVITIS; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED EVALUATION; OF-LIFE IMPACT; LOTEPREDNOL ETABONATE; OCULAR ALLERGY; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; CONTROLLED PARALLEL; STEROID RESPONDERS; EYE DISEASE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02272.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 [眼科学];
摘要
. Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) is an inflammatory response of the conjunctiva triggered by exposure to seasonal allergens. Treatment options for SAC include artificial tears, antihistamines, decongestants, mast cell stabilizers, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, dual antihistamine/mast cell stabilizers, immunotherapy and corticosteroids. Topical, intranasal and systemic formulations of corticosteroids have traditionally provided the most effective relief of the inflammation and signs and symptoms associated with severe, acute exacerbations of SAC. However, steroid-induced ocular and systemic side-effects have limited the prescribing of these agents. This limitation of traditional corticosteroids led to the development of modified corticosteroids that retain the anti-inflammatory mechanism of action of traditional corticosteroids with a much-improved safety profile because of their rapid breakdown to inactive metabolites after exerting their activity. The development of one such novel corticosteroid, loteprednol etabonate (LE), led to the insertion of an ester (instead of a ketone) group at the carbon-20 (C-20) position of the basic corticosteroid structure. Clinical trials assessing this C-20 ester corticosteroid have demonstrated similar efficacy to C-20 ketone corticosteroids in the prevention or treatment of the signs and symptoms of SAC but with a greatly improved safety profile, as the C-20 ester corticosteroid is less likely to elevate intraocular pressure. In addition, the ketone at the C-20 position has been implicated in the formation of cataract, while nonketolic corticosteroids do not form Schiff base intermediates with lens proteins, which is a common first step in cataractogenesis. The clinical relevance of the C-20 ester corticosteroid class, as modelled by LE, is that they provide both effective and safe treatment of the inflammation associated with SAC and relief of its signs and symptoms. Loteprednol etabonate offers a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with debilitating acute exacerbations as well as chronic forms of the disease.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 407
页数:9
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]
The conjunctival provocation test model of ocular allergy: Utility for assessment of an ocular corticosteroid, loteprednol etabonate [J].
Abelson, M ;
Howes, J ;
George, M .
JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 14 (06) :533-542
[3]
The reliability, validity, and preliminary responsiveness of the Eye Allergy Patient Impact Questionnaire (EAPIQ) [J].
Alexander M. ;
Berger W. ;
Buchholz P. ;
Walt J. ;
Burk C. ;
Lee J. ;
Arbuckle R. ;
Abetz L. .
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3 (1)
[4]
MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY-STANDARDIZED CAT EXTRACT IMMUNOTHERAPY - RISK-BENEFIT EFFECTS FROM A DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO STUDY [J].
ALVAREZCUESTA, E ;
CUESTAHERRANZ, J ;
PUYANARUIZ, J ;
CUESTAHERRANZ, C ;
BLANCOQUIROS, A .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1994, 93 (03) :556-566
[5]
American Academy of Allergy Asthma & Immunology, 2000, ALL REP, V3, P1
[6]
American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2003, CONJ PREF PRACT PATT, P1
[7]
ARMALY MANSOUR F., 1965, INVEST OPHTHALMOL, V4, P187
[8]
Asbell Penny, 1997, CLAO Journal, V23, P31
[9]
Barney NP, 2003, MIDDLETONS ALLERGY P, V2, P1599
[10]
INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE RESPONSE TO LOTEPREDNOL ETABONATE IN KNOWN STEROID RESPONDERS [J].
BARTLETT, JD ;
HORWITZ, B ;
LAIBOVITZ, R ;
HOWES, JF .
JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 9 (02) :157-165