Socioeconomic differences in the utilization of health services in a Dutch population: The contribution of health status

被引:54
作者
vanderMeer, JBW
vandenBos, J
Mackenbach, JP
机构
[1] Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3000 DR Rotterdam
关键词
social class; health services utilization; health services access; health status measures; surveys; Netherlands;
D O I
10.1016/0168-8510(96)87673-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The main question addressed here is to what extent socioeconomic differences in the utilization of health services in the Netherlands can be explained by health status. Our aim is to assess whether the health service has achieved equal access for equal needs, and which health status measures best control for need. Cross-sectional survey data from 2867 respondents with respect to utilization of six different types of health service are used for analysis. Socioeconomic differences in utilization were present for all services after we controlled for age, sex and marital status. By controlling for health status, differences changed markedly for all health services analyzed. Differences in general practitioner contacts diminished but did not disappear (adjusted odds ratio primary education/university 2.22). The pattern of excess contacts with specialist physicians reverses (adjusted odds ratio 0.74). This is also true for the physiotherapist. The pattern of hospitalizations is unclear. Use of over-the-counter medicines is little affected by control for health status. Adjusted differences in hse of prescription medicines become small. Control for health status is best achieved with a set of health measures covering several dimensions of health. Whether low relative utilization among those with low education reflects limited access, or whether higher use of other services is compensatory is hard to decide on the basis of this study. Monitoring access to health care is important for all sorts of systems, including those which are believed to be equitable.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   THE NATIONAL PROFILE OF ACCESS TO MEDICAL-CARE - WHERE DO WE STAND [J].
ADAY, LA ;
ANDERSEN, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1984, 74 (12) :1331-1339
[2]  
BAART A, 1973, THESIS ERASMUS U ROT
[3]   ASSESSING EQUITY IN ACCESS TO HEALTH-CARE PROVISION IN THE UK - DOES WHERE YOU LIVE AFFECT YOUR CHANCES OF GETTING A CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT [J].
BENSHLOMO, Y ;
CHATURVEDI, N .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1995, 49 (02) :200-204
[4]   EQUITY AND CONSULTATION RATES IN GENERAL-PRACTICE [J].
BLAXTER, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 288 (6435) :1963-1967
[5]  
*CENTR BUR STAT, 1992, NETH HLTH INT SURV 1
[6]   EQUITY AND THE NHS - SELF-REPORTED MORBIDITY, ACCESS, AND PRIMARY CARE [J].
COLLINS, E ;
KLEIN, R .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1980, 281 (6248) :1111-1115
[7]  
DUFLOREY CV, 1982, EUROPEAN SERIES, V12
[8]   DO THE POOR COST MORE - A MULTIHOSPITAL STUDY OF PATIENTS SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS AND USE OF HOSPITAL RESOURCES [J].
EPSTEIN, AM ;
STERN, RS ;
WEISSMAN, JS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 322 (16) :1122-1128
[9]  
*ER U ROTT DEP EPI, 1989, QUEST ERGO SURV
[10]  
FINDLAY IN, 1991, BRIT HEART J, V66, P70