Comparing supply-side specifications in models of global agriculture and the food system

被引:61
作者
Robinson, Sherman [1 ]
van Meijl, Hans [2 ]
Willenbockel, Dirk [3 ]
Valin, Hugo [4 ]
Fujimori, Shinichiro [5 ]
Masui, Toshihiko [5 ]
Sands, Ron [6 ]
Wise, Marshall [7 ]
Calvin, Katherine [7 ]
Havlik, Petr [4 ]
d'Croz, Daniel Mason [1 ]
Tabeau, Andrzej [2 ]
Kavallari, Aikaterini [2 ]
Schmitz, Christoph [8 ]
Dietrich, Jan Philipp [8 ]
von Lampe, Martin [9 ]
机构
[1] Int Food Policy Res Inst, Washington, DC 20006 USA
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res Ctr, Agr Econ Res Inst LEI, NL-2585 DB The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Univ Sussex, Inst Dev Studies, Brighton BN1 9RE, E Sussex, England
[4] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
[5] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[6] Econ Res Serv, USDA, Washington, DC 20250 USA
[7] Pacific NW Natl Lab, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[8] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[9] Org Econ Cooperat & Dev, F-75775 Paris 16, France
基金
美国农业部; 美国能源部;
关键词
Global agricultural models; Global food system scenario analysis; General equilibrium; Partial equilibrium; GROWTH; TRADE;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12087
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This article compares the theoretical and functional specification of production in partial equilibrium (PE) and computable general equilibrium (CGE) models of the global agricultural and food system included in the AgMIP model comparison study. The two model families differ in their scopepartial versus economy-wideand in how they represent technology and the behavior of supply and demand in markets. The CGE models are deep structural models in that they explicitly solve the maximization problem of consumers and producers, assuming utility maximization and profit maximization with production/cost functions that include all factor inputs. The PE models divide into two groups on the supply side: (1) shallow structural models, which essentially specify area/yield supply functions with no explicit maximization behavior, and (2) deep structural models that provide a detailed activity-analysis specification of technology and explicit optimizing behavior by producers. While the models vary in their specifications of technology, both within and between the PE and CGE families, we consider two stylized theoretical models to compare the behavior of crop yields and supply functions in CGE models with their behavior in shallow structural PE models. We find that the theoretical responsiveness of supply to changes in prices can be similar, depending on parameter choices that define the behavior of implicit supply functions over the domain of applicability defined by the common scenarios used in the AgMIP comparisons. In practice, however, the applied models are more complex and differ in their empirical sensitivity to variations in specificationcomparability of results given parameter choices is an empirical question. To illustrate the issues, sensitivity analysis is done with one global CGE model, MAGNET, to indicate how the results vary with different specification of technical change, and how they compare with the results from PE models.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 35
页数:15
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, INT FOOD POL RES I, DOI DOI 10.2499/9780896291867
[2]   POLICY LESSONS FROM TRADE-FOCUSED, 2-SECTOR MODELS [J].
DEVARAGAN, S ;
LEWIS, JD ;
ROBINSON, S .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 1990, 12 (04) :625-657
[3]  
Dietrich J. P, 2013, TECHNOL FOR IN PRESS
[4]  
Dollar D., 1993, COMPETITIVENESS CONV
[5]  
Dollar D., 1997, EC PRODUCTIVITY, V2, P39
[6]   Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets [J].
Havlik, Petr ;
Schneider, Uwe A. ;
Schmid, Erwin ;
Boettcher, Hannes ;
Fritz, Steffen ;
Skalsky, Rastislav ;
Aoki, Kentaro ;
De Cara, Stephane ;
Kindermann, Georg ;
Kraxner, Florian ;
Leduc, Sylvain ;
McCallum, Ian ;
Mosnier, Aline ;
Sauer, Timm ;
Obersteiner, Michael .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (10) :5690-5702
[7]   A new proof of Uzawa's steady-state growth theorem [J].
Jones, Charles I. ;
Scrimgeour, Dean .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2008, 90 (01) :180-182
[8]  
Kets W., 2003, 58 CPB, V58
[9]  
Krugman Paul., 1990, RETHINKING INT TRADE
[10]   Productivity growth and convergence in agriculture versus manufacturing [J].
Martin, W ;
Mitra, D .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2001, 49 (02) :403-422