How do exchange rate movements affect Chinese exports? - A firm-level investigation

被引:183
作者
Li, Hongbin [1 ]
Ma, Hong [1 ]
Xu, Yuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Exchange rate elasticity; Exchange rate pass-through; Extensive margin; PASS-THROUGH; TRADE; MARKET; COMPETITION; COSTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.04.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper provides first-hand firm-level evidence on Chinese exporters' reaction to RMB exchange rate movements. We find that the RMB price response to exchange rate changes is very small, indicating relatively high exchange rate pass-through into foreign currency denominated prices, while the volume response is moderate and significant. Furthermore, exporters with higher productivity price more to market, though the pass-through is still very high. Other sources of heterogeneity, such as import intensity, distribution costs, income level of the destination countries, and foreign ownership also matter. Moreover, RMB appreciation reduces the probability of entry as well as the probability of continuing in the export market. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 161
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Ahmed S, 2009, 287 BOARD GOV FED RE
  • [2] Importers, Exporters, and Exchange Rate Disconnect
    Amiti, Mary
    Itskhoki, Oleg
    Konings, Jozef
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (07) : 1942 - 1978
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, ECONOMIST
  • [4] [Anonymous], 12729 NBER
  • [5] [Anonymous], NEW YORK TIMES 0315
  • [6] [Anonymous], EUROPEAN CENTRAL BAN
  • [7] [Anonymous], 282 BANK INT SETTL
  • [8] Arkolakis C., 2012, STAGGERED ADJUSTMENT
  • [9] Pricing-to-Market, Trade Costs, and International Relative Prices
    Atkeson, Andrew
    Burstein, Ariel
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (05) : 1998 - 2031
  • [10] The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States
    Autor, David H.
    Dorn, David
    Hanson, Gordon H.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (06) : 2121 - 2168