Continuous epidural ropivacaine 0.2% for analgesia after lower abdominal surgery

被引:41
作者
Etches, RC
Writer, WDR
Ansley, D
Nydahl, PA
Ong, BY
Lui, A
Badner, N
Kawolski, S
Muir, H
Shukla, R
Beattie, WS
机构
[1] UNIV QUEENSLAND,DEPT ANAESTHESIOL & INTENS CARE,BRISBANE,QLD,AUSTRALIA
[2] DALHOUSIE UNIV,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,HALIFAX,NS,CANADA
[3] VANCOUVER GEN HOSP,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,VANCOUVER,BC,CANADA
[4] OREBRO MED CTR HOSP,DEPT ANESTHESIA,OREBRO,SWEDEN
[5] WOMENS HOSP MED CTR,DEPT ANESTHESIA,WINNIPEG,MB,CANADA
[6] OTTAWA CIVIC HOSP,DEPT ANESTHESIA,OTTAWA,ON K1Y 4E9,CANADA
[7] LONDON ONTARIO HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT ANAESTHESIOL,LONDON,ON,CANADA
[8] MCMASTER UNIV,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,HAMILTON,ON,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199704000-00016
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine whether a lumbar epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% would provide effective analgesia with an acceptably low incidence of motor blockade and side effects after lower abdominal surgery. After combined general and epidural anesthesia and surgery, 125 patients were randomly assigned to receive either saline or ropivacaine 0.2% at a rate of 6, 8, 10, 12, or 14 mL/h (Groups R6, R8, R10, R12, and R14, respectively) for 21 h. Supplemental analgesia, if required, was provided with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine. Data were collected at 4, 8, and 21 h, and included morphine consumption, pain scores at rest and with coughing, motor and sensory block, and adverse events. Cumulative morphine consumption was less in Groups R10, R12, and R14 compared with the saline group. At 4 h analgesia was better among patients receiving ropivacaine, but at 21 h pain scores were identical. Sensory blockade at 8 and 21 h was greater in the ropivacaine groups compared with the saline group. Approximately 30% of R8, R10, and R12 patients, and 63% of R14 patients had demonstrable motor block of the lower limbs at 21 hours. We conclude that lumbar epidural ropivacaine 0.2% reduces parenteral morphine requirements but has little effect on pain scores and may be associated with motor blockade.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 790
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BADER AM, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V68, P724
[2]   COMPARISON OF EXTRADURAL ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE [J].
BROCKWAY, MS ;
BANNISTER, J ;
MCCLURE, JH ;
MCKEOWN, D ;
WILDSMITH, JAW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 66 (01) :31-37
[3]   MATERNAL TEMPERATURE REGULATION DURING EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA FOR LABOR [J].
CAMANN, WR ;
HORTVET, LA ;
HUGHES, N ;
BADER, AM ;
DATTA, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 67 (05) :565-568
[4]  
FELDMAN HS, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V73, P373
[5]  
FELDMAN HS, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V69, P794
[6]   MATERNAL PYREXIA ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOR [J].
FUSI, L ;
MARESH, MJA ;
STEER, PJ ;
BEARD, RW .
LANCET, 1989, 1 (8649) :1250-1252
[7]   EXTRADURAL ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION - A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF 0.5-PERCENT ROPIVACAINE WITH 0.5-PERCENT BUPIVACAINE [J].
GRIFFIN, RP ;
REYNOLDS, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 (05) :512-516
[8]  
KERKKAMP HEM, 1990, REGION ANESTH, V15, P204
[9]  
MAZOIT JX, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, P477
[10]   CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC PROPERTIES OF BUPIVACAINE AND LIDOCAINE COMPARED WITH THOSE OF ROPIVACAINE, A NEW AMIDE LOCAL-ANESTHETIC [J].
MOLLER, R ;
COVINO, BG .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 72 (02) :322-329