Data shaving: A focused screening approach

被引:21
作者
Schreyer, SK
Parker, CN
Maggiora, GM
机构
[1] Chem Comp Grp, Montreal, PQ H3A 2R7, Canada
[2] Novartis Inst BioMed Res Inc, Lead Discovery Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES | 2004年 / 44卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ci030025s
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The number of compounds available for evaluation as part of the drug discovery process continues to increase. These compounds may exist physically or be stored electronically allowing screening by either actual or virtual means. This growing number of compounds has generated an increasing need for effective strategies to direct screening efforts. Initial efforts toward this goal led to the development of methods to select diverse sets of compounds for screening, methods to cluster actives into related groups of compounds, and tools to select compounds similar to actives of interest for further screening. In this work we extend these earlier efforts to exploit information about inactive compounds to help make rational decisions about which sets of compounds to include as part of a continuing screening campaign, or as part of a focused follow-up effort. This method uses the information from inactive compounds to "shave" off or deprioritize compounds similar to inactives from further consideration. This methodology can be used in two ways: first, to provide a rational means of deciding when sufficient compounds containing certain structural features have been tested and second as a tool to enhance similarity searching around known actives. Similarity searching is improved by deprioritizing compounds predicted to be inactive, due to the presence of structural features associated with inactivity.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 479
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Andersson PM, 1999, MOLECULAR DIVERSITY IN DRUG DESIGN, P197
[2]   Generation and display of activity-weighted chemical hyperstructures [J].
Brown, N ;
Willett, P ;
Wilton, DJ ;
Lewis, RA .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2003, 43 (01) :288-297
[3]   Pattern recognition and massively distributed computing [J].
Davies, EK ;
Glick, M ;
Harrison, KN ;
Richards, WG .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 23 (16) :1544-1550
[4]   Algorithm5: A technique for fuzzy similarity clustering of chemical inventories [J].
Doman, TN ;
Cibulskis, JM ;
Cibulskis, MJ ;
McCray, PD ;
Spangler, DP .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1996, 36 (06) :1195-1204
[5]  
Fernandes PB, 2001, DRUGS PHARM SCI, V114, P1
[6]   Binary quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of estrogen receptor ligands [J].
Gao, H ;
Williams, C ;
Labute, P ;
Bajorath, J .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1999, 39 (01) :164-168
[7]   Visual and computational analysis of structure-activity relationships in high-throughput screening data [J].
Gedeck, P ;
Willett, P .
CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 5 (04) :389-395
[8]  
GLICK M, IN PRESS J BIOMOL SC
[9]   MOLECULAR SUBSTRUCTURE SIMILARITY SEARCHING - EFFICIENT RETRIEVAL IN 2-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE DATABASES [J].
HAGADONE, TR .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1992, 32 (05) :515-521
[10]  
Hastie T, 2001, GENOME BIOL, V2