The accuracy of antenatal ultrasound in the detection of facial clefts in a low-risk screening population

被引:75
作者
Cash, C
Set, P
Coleman, N
机构
[1] Addenbrookes NHS Trust, Dept Histopathol, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[2] Addenbrookes NHS Trust, Dept Radiol, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
关键词
antenatal ultrasound; facial clefts; screening;
D O I
10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00508.x
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in the detection of facial clefts in a low-risk screening population and to report on the outcome of these pregnancies. Design We retrospectively reviewed antenatal ultrasound records from the obstetric ultrasound department, postnatal records from the regional craniofacial unit and autopsy reports of fetuses over 16 weeks' gestational age from the regional pathology department over a S-year period (1993-97). Cross-referencing between the three data sets identified all cases of facial clefts. Results Out of 23 577 live and still births, 30 had facial clefts; four were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 26 cases, 10 had associated major anomalies. There were 19 live births and seven terminations. Six of the seven terminations had other major abnormalities. Our detection rate for cleft lip and palate was 93% and the detection rate for isolated cleft palate was 22%. Isolated cleft lip was detected in 67% of cases. The overall detection rate for facial clefts was 65%. Conclusion From our results and a review of the literature it is clear that before standards can be set we need to define which facial clefts are sonographically demonstrable. Our data provide information for effective counseling and setting of standards for clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 436
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   FETAL CLEFT-LIP AND PALATE - SONOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS AND POSTNATAL OUTCOME [J].
BENACERRAF, BR ;
MULLIKEN, JB .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 92 (06) :1045-1051
[2]   6-year experience of prenatal diagnosis in an unselected population in Oxford, UK [J].
Boyd, PA ;
Chamberlain, P ;
Hicks, NR .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9140) :1577-1581
[3]  
BRONSHTEIN M, 1994, OBSTET GYNECOL, V84, P73
[4]   Ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities [J].
Chitty, LS .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1995, 15 (13) :1241-1257
[5]   EFFECTIVENESS OF ROUTINE ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN DETECTING FETAL STRUCTURAL ABNORMALITIES IN A LOW-RISK POPULATION [J].
CHITTY, LS ;
HUNT, GH ;
MOORE, J ;
LOBB, MO .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 303 (6811) :1165-1169
[6]  
COUPLAND MA, 1988, CLEFT PALATE J, V25, P33
[7]   Screening for chromosomal abnormality [J].
Dubbins, PA .
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 1998, 19 (04) :310-317
[8]  
Hafner E, 1997, PRENATAL DIAG, V17, P51, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199701)17:1<51::AID-PD42>3.3.CO
[9]  
2-7
[10]   SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF ROUTINE ANTENATAL SCREENING FOR CONGENITAL-ANOMALIES BY ULTRASOUND - THE BELGIAN MULTICENTRIC STUDY [J].
LEVI, S ;
HYJAZI, Y ;
SCHAAPS, JP ;
DEFOORT, P ;
COULON, R ;
BUEKENS, P .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 1 (02) :102-110