Evaluating the effectiveness of proactive telephone counselling for smoking cessation in a randomized controlled trial

被引:48
作者
Gilbert, H
Sutton, S
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London NW3 2PF, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Inst Publ Hlth, Cambridge, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
proactive counselling; quitline; smoking cessation; telephone helplines;
D O I
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01398.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of repeated-contact proactive telephone counselling for smoking cessation in a UK setting. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting The Quitline((R)), an established national telephone counselling service available throughout the UK. Participants and intervention A total of 1457 callers to the Quitline in 2000 and 2001 were allocated randomly to a Control group to receive usual care or to a Repeated Contact group to be offered five proactive calls in addition to usual care. Measurements Prolonged abstinence and 24-hour point-prevalent abstinence 6 and 12 months after recruitment, quit attempts and 24-hour periods of abstinence in non-quitters. Findings No significant differences were found between the Repeated Contact and Control groups on prolonged or point-prevalent abstinence. On an intention-to-treat basis, 9.5% of the Control group were abstinent for longer than 6 months at the 12-month follow-up, compared with 9.3% of the Repeated Contact group; 18.9% and 20.2%, respectively, were point-prevalent abstinent at the 6-month follow-up. Significantly more non-quitters in the Control group made a quit attempt in the first 6 months following recruitment than in the Repeated Contact group (62.6%/56.1%, P < 0.05). Conclusions Proactive telephone counselling did not significantly increase abstinence rates, and appeared to decrease quit attempts, in callers to the Quitline. A non-structured, client-led counselling protocol and insufficient pre-quit motivational counselling could account for the lack of effect.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 598
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, SMOK KILLS WHIT PAP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, HLTH DEPRIVATION INE
[3]  
Borenstein M., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis: A Computer Program
[4]   The effectiveness of callback counselling for smoking cessation: a randomized trial [J].
Borland, R ;
Segan, CJ ;
Livingston, PM ;
Owen, N .
ADDICTION, 2001, 96 (06) :881-889
[5]   Under-use of smoking-cessation treatments - Results from the National Health Interview Survey, 2000 [J].
Cokkinides, VE ;
Ward, E ;
Jemal, A ;
Thun, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 28 (01) :119-122
[6]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF SELF-HELP MATERIALS, PERSONALIZED FEEDBACK, AND TELEPHONE COUNSELING WITH NONVOLUNTEER SMOKERS [J].
CURRY, SJ ;
MCBRIDE, C ;
GROTHAUS, LC ;
LOUIE, D ;
WAGNER, EH .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 63 (06) :1005-1014
[7]   METHODS USED TO QUIT SMOKING IN THE UNITED-STATES - DO CESSATION PROGRAMS HELP [J].
FIORE, MC ;
NOVOTNY, TE ;
PIERCE, JP ;
GIOVINO, GA ;
HATZIANDREU, EJ ;
NEWCOMB, PA ;
SURAWICZ, TS ;
DAVIS, RM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (20) :2760-2765
[8]   Who Calls QUIT®?: The characteristics of smokers seeking advice via a telephone helpline compared with smokers attending a clinic and those in the general population [J].
Gilbert, H ;
Sutton, S ;
Sutherland, G .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 119 (10) :933-939
[9]  
Hughes JR, 2003, NICOTINE TOB RES, V5, P13, DOI 10.1080/1462220031000070552
[10]   Telephone counseling for smoking cessation: Rationales and meta-analytic review of evidence [J].
Lichtenstein, E ;
Glasgow, RE ;
Lando, HA ;
OssipKlein, DJ ;
Boles, SM .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 1996, 11 (02) :243-257