Cognitive and institutional barriers to new forms of cooperation on environmental protection - Insights from Project XL and Habitat Conservation Plans

被引:31
作者
Hoffman, AJ
Riley, HC
Troast, JG
Bazerman, MH
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Management, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0002764202045005006
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Many perceive the predominantly command-and-control structure of regulatory policy to be overly restrictive and inefficient in achieving America's emerging environmental goals. In response, the U.S. government has introduced several voluntary programs to develop innovative, beyond-compliance environmental management solutions through the collaboration between government agencies and regulated entities. Yet, these programs have not gained widespread acceptance. This article analyzes the cognitive and institutional barriers to that acceptance by looking specifically at two programs-Project XL and Habitat Conservation Plans. These barriers act out of force of habit, creating a resistance to change and a rejection of new forms of regulatory policy. The authors argue that policy change requires a shift in how individuals think and how institutions guide that thinking.
引用
收藏
页码:820 / 845
页数:26
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   FOOLS RUSH IN - THE INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT OF INDUSTRY CREATION [J].
ALDRICH, HE ;
FIOL, CM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (04) :645-670
[2]   TECHNOLOGICAL DISCONTINUITIES AND DOMINANT DESIGNS - A CYCLICAL MODEL OF TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE [J].
ANDERSON, P ;
TUSHMAN, ML .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (04) :604-633
[3]  
[Anonymous], MANAGING STRATEGIC I
[4]  
BADEN J, 1995, SEATTLE TIMES 1025, pB5
[5]  
BAZERMAN M, IN PRESS NEGOTIATION
[6]  
Bazerman M.H., 2002, JUDGEMENT MANAGERIAL
[7]   I WON THE AUCTION BUT DONT WANT THE PRIZE [J].
BAZERMAN, MH ;
SAMUELSON, WF .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1983, 27 (04) :618-634
[8]  
BLACKMAN A, 1999, COST DEV SITE SPECIF
[9]  
Braithwaite John, 1992, Responsive Regulation
[10]  
Breckenridge LP, 1999, ECOL LAW QUART, V25, P692